Would not all nodes involved in a particular cluster be roughly the same? Yes, a separate thread should be started to discuss the technical issues.
Jamie On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > (Ioannis, please don't take that personally) > > We can start a discussion around clustering, but I strongly disagree > with several design > decisions that have been made by Ioannis while working on cellar. > Mainly the assumption > that all nodes are roughly the same. > > I think the cellar is a nice experiment, but I'm not so sure it's > really so useful in real life. > So, if this is to be imported in Karaf, I'd like that not to be in > trunk for now until we can > start a real discussion on what problems we want to solve and what's > the best way to > solve them. > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Ioannis made a great work by using Hazelcast to create a cluster of Karaf >> nodes. >> >> He has already blogged around: >> http://iocanel.blogspot.com/2011/03/karaf-clustering-using-hazelcast.html >> >> I like the design and I think it could be very interesting to embed this >> feature in Karaf 3.0.0. >> >> Ioannnis has kindly accepted to donate this work to Karaf. >> >> The next steps are: >> - think about an assemblies extension to provide cluster ready distribution >> - document Karaf clustering in manual (mostly based on the Ioannis' blog) >> - add an example of Karaf cluster usage. >> I propose to work with Ioannis around these steps. >> >> WDYT ? >> Are you OK to ship Karaf clustering using Hazelcast in Karaf ? >> Do you think that we need a kind of "agnostic" layer around clustering >> (especially if some of us already started to work around a different kind of >> Karaf clusters) ? >> >> Thanks >> Regards >> JB >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
