Hey all, I would opt for some from Apache repositories too, since we all have access to them. I preffer a ServiceMix as destination project because from following reasons:
1) We have more Karaf commiters in ServiceMix than in any other project listed before 2) Our communities in past was strictly connected and we still cooperate very well 3) It looks like an application server domain but it don't have to be - exposed connection factory can point to external IBM MQ or Oracle broker 4) ServiceMix can still be used with Geronimo, and these commands, if we'll keep dependencies clear, can be part of Geronimo distribution to Only one problem we have is a big question mark regarding SMX5 project scope discussed few months before. If it still be a OSGi ready or not. But so far development on 5th release is almost nothing and we can focus on SMX4 and OSGi doing some improvements for community eg in ServiceMix 4.4. That can proof that OSGi is the best choice for runtime. :) Gute nacht Łukasz Dywicki -- Code-House http://code-house.org Wiadomość napisana przez Ioannis Canellos w dniu 2012-01-16, o godz. 19:47: >> I think the most appropriate place for this kind of stuff is geronimo >> since the general idea for geronimo is to provide EE funcionality that >> elaborates other projects. > > Yeah, Geronimo would be a great place too, as long as it can provide a > feature descriptor that would allow its use in plain Karaf. But I really > don't think that this would be a problem. > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer > *
