We have a few iTest failures we need to resolve, then we should have a clean build of trunk (running all tests).
Once we have a clean building trunk its time to branch - we still need to polish 3.0.x a bit before we do a Release Candidate. Cheers, Jamie On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to revitalize this discussion a little bit: How far are we? What is > still missing before we can start the stabilization branch? Maybe we can > finally provide a checklist of must-be-included :-) > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> For the spec, I think that we have to release a new version of the bundles >> in any case. >> >> I can take it. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> >> On 01/17/2012 09:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >>> The changes I've made so far are in a github branch, I can at least >>> backport the inclusion of the activator and custom specs (jaxp, stax, >>> jaxb, jaxws) to trunk. For the versions of the exported package, I'm >>> still not sure what's the best way, we can either export versions on >>> the packages or release new versions of the bundles (we'll need a >>> release of the specs anyway). >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dan, >>>> >>>> Guillaume made a first change on trunk around that. >>>> >>>> So it will includes in the branch. >>>> >>>> I plan to include sub-shell and profiles too on this branch. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> On 01/16/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:19:53 AM David Jencks wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> We've been feature complete since last august, except everyone keeps >>>>>> deciding we need more features. I think Andreas's point is that unless >>>>>> we >>>>>> decide that we're going to do a release we'll never run out of >>>>>> essential >>>>>> features that absolutely need to be in 3.0 before we can release it. >>>>>> >>>>>> What specific features do you need in 3.0 that aren't there right now? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is Guillaume's activator stuff ready/in there? That would be the main >>>>> thing >>>>> I'd like to see included at this point. >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> anyway +1 from me. >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> david jencks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Basically this is a good idea. I am just unsure if we are already at >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> point where we should do the branch. Do we have all features necessary >>>>>>> for 3.0 finished? I think we should do the branch as soon as we are >>>>>>> feature complete. So the branch really can focus on stabilizing >>>>>>> things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 14.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Andreas Pieber: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As all of you know we really want to get Karaf 3.0 out now for some >>>>>>>> time. But as long we add new "groundbreaking" features to the master >>>>>>>> we'll always destabilize it at some point. To give us a chance to >>>>>>>> finally stabilize the entire thing and getting out a 3.0 release I >>>>>>>> would like to propose a feature freeze for 3.0 starting (for example) >>>>>>>> today in a week. Pack everything into trunk you already have and >>>>>>>> really want to be part of Karaf 3. Then we'll cut off a new branch >>>>>>>> (karaf-3.0.x) where we do not allow any new features. The version on >>>>>>>> the master/trunk will be increased to 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT. This should be >>>>>>>> the place then for all new features. This step should free us from >>>>>>>> new regressions and give us the time to finalize 3.0.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>
