Add to the list verifying Java 7 support (specifically the jar 14 issue - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-1067)
Cheers, Jamie On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Jamie G. <[email protected]> wrote: > We have a few iTest failures we need to resolve, then we should have a > clean build of trunk (running all tests). > > Once we have a clean building trunk its time to branch - we still need > to polish 3.0.x a bit before we do a Release Candidate. > > Cheers, > Jamie > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just to revitalize this discussion a little bit: How far are we? What is >> still missing before we can start the stabilization branch? Maybe we can >> finally provide a checklist of must-be-included :-) >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 09:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Guillaume, >>> >>> For the spec, I think that we have to release a new version of the bundles >>> in any case. >>> >>> I can take it. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 01/17/2012 09:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >>> >>>> The changes I've made so far are in a github branch, I can at least >>>> backport the inclusion of the activator and custom specs (jaxp, stax, >>>> jaxb, jaxws) to trunk. For the versions of the exported package, I'm >>>> still not sure what's the best way, we can either export versions on >>>> the packages or release new versions of the bundles (we'll need a >>>> release of the specs anyway). >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:59, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Dan, >>>>> >>>>> Guillaume made a first change on trunk around that. >>>>> >>>>> So it will includes in the branch. >>>>> >>>>> I plan to include sub-shell and profiles too on this branch. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/16/2012 04:31 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, January 14, 2012 9:19:53 AM David Jencks wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We've been feature complete since last august, except everyone keeps >>>>>>> deciding we need more features. I think Andreas's point is that unless >>>>>>> we >>>>>>> decide that we're going to do a release we'll never run out of >>>>>>> essential >>>>>>> features that absolutely need to be in 3.0 before we can release it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What specific features do you need in 3.0 that aren't there right now? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is Guillaume's activator stuff ready/in there? That would be the main >>>>>> thing >>>>>> I'd like to see included at this point. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dan >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> anyway +1 from me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks >>>>>>> david jencks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 14, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Christian Schneider wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Basically this is a good idea. I am just unsure if we are already at >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> point where we should do the branch. Do we have all features necessary >>>>>>>> for 3.0 finished? I think we should do the branch as soon as we are >>>>>>>> feature complete. So the branch really can focus on stabilizing >>>>>>>> things. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Christian >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 14.01.2012 16:40, schrieb Andreas Pieber: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey guys, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As all of you know we really want to get Karaf 3.0 out now for some >>>>>>>>> time. But as long we add new "groundbreaking" features to the master >>>>>>>>> we'll always destabilize it at some point. To give us a chance to >>>>>>>>> finally stabilize the entire thing and getting out a 3.0 release I >>>>>>>>> would like to propose a feature freeze for 3.0 starting (for example) >>>>>>>>> today in a week. Pack everything into trunk you already have and >>>>>>>>> really want to be part of Karaf 3. Then we'll cut off a new branch >>>>>>>>> (karaf-3.0.x) where we do not allow any new features. The version on >>>>>>>>> the master/trunk will be increased to 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT. This should be >>>>>>>>> the place then for all new features. This step should free us from >>>>>>>>> new regressions and give us the time to finalize 3.0.0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>>> Andreas >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>> [email protected] >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>>
