oh, just see that it's already gone out :-) nevermind, see my comments as input for the next report; they'rent that important anyhow.
Kind regards, Andreas On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Andreas Pieber <[email protected]> wrote: > seeing progress is always a fine thing :-) BTW are there any new blog > entries, events karaf is presented on (and so on). > > Following the general list it seams (to me at least) that "community > building" what had been done for community building is also an > important part of the report; so such entries might be interesting for > the board (besides the obvious activity on the various mailinglists). > Just an idea. > > @commits: maybe writing Commit mailing list instead of commits; while > we done tons of commits this list also contains the hudson failure > reports (we also received tons of in the last months) creating quite a > false impression of the activitiy :-) > > Besides of that smaller issues +1. > > Those where some great 3 months again with tons of activities and > quite great procedure toward 3.0.0! Thx to all of you guys! > > Kind regards, > Andreas > > On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Apache Karaf provides higher level features and services >> specifically designed for creating OSGi-based servers. >> >> Community >> ========= >> Indicators during the last 3 months: >> - Download: around 12,000 distribution downloads >> - User mailing list: 424 messages >> - Dev mailing list: 495 messages >> - Commits: 758 commits >> >> Development >> =========== >> The following new releases have been voted: >> * Apache Karaf 2.2.6 >> * Apache Karaf 2.2.7 >> * Apache Karaf Cellar 2.2.4 >> >> We made progresses on the stabilization of the Karaf 3.0 next release. >> >> A stabilization branch is going to be create including a 3.0-beta >> pre-release. >> >> Web Site >> ======= >> A new website has been deployed including minor updates and bug fixes. >> >> Branding >> ======== >> * project website basics: ok >> * website nav links: ok >> * trademarks: ok >> * logo: ok >> * metadata: ok >> >> Issues for board consideration >> ============================== >> None so far.
