nicely summed up; +1 :-) Kind regards, Andreas
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > I've read a lot of interesting opinions and I'd like to share mine: > > i) The Karaf shell should start asap, unless explicitly configured. The > enter thing is nice but should be optional imho. > ii) Determining when Karaf is started is one thing, determining when an > application is started is another. > iii) A log entry that says Karaf has started sounds enough, we can > optionally provide that info through the info command. > iv) Different users have different needs on what started means. To cover > all cases we could allow the user to use a configuration file that will > contain requirements (package, service etc) and have everyone configure it > however he wishes. > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Twitter: iocanel > *
