+1 I like the idea Andreas.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Keep things simple and adopt same convention as cellar > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andreas Pieber <anpie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as >> possible, even if this means some more cherry-picking between the >> various branches. Independently, after getting some good portion of >> sleep and some more time to think about this issue I think we should >> walk down the same road as cellar: using 2.x for karaf 2.x support and >> 3.x for karaf 3 support (although this limits our version range >> according to semver.org). An option around this problem might be to >> add an additional version behind; e.g. starting with 2.0.0.0 and >> 3.0.0.0 for the first releases; or in other words >> KARAF.WC_MAJOR.WC_MINOR.WC_MICRO. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Kind regards, >> Andreas >> >> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Łukasz Dywicki <l...@code-house.org> >> wrote: >> > Once again I back with WebConsole topic. As we plan to support bot 2.x >> and 3.x line. Current trunk (0.3.0-SNAPSHOT) of webconsole supports 2.x and >> I am about to start 3.x branch to get karaf trunk also supported. The >> problem is that we can not have the same version for both Karaf versions >> due changes in package names and so on. So the WebConsole must have two >> different versions, one for Karaf 2.x and second for 3.x. >> > >> > Another option is to make *core* of webconsole Karaf version agnostic, >> but then we still have submodules which have to support different versions >> of Karaf & OSGi runtime. Currently thing which breaks compability of 2.x vs >> 3.x is JAAS stuff and move of some packages to jaas.boot. In my opinion >> it's easier to manage release process with one version per branch, not like >> Aries does - a version per module. >> > >> > On IRC we had few options, one was classifier, another was to start with >> 2.x version for Karaf 2.x and 3.x for Karaf 3.x - just like we have with >> Cellar. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Lukasz >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Pr. Consultant at FuseSource.com > Twitter : @cmoulliard > Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
