+1, for keeping the same versioning as in Cellar

2012/8/17 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>:
> It sounds good, I will do that in Cellar if all agrees.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/17/2012 06:38 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
>>
>> I'm with Lukasz on that one; we should keep our releases as simple as
>> possible, even if this means some more cherry-picking between the
>> various branches. Independently, after getting some good portion of
>> sleep and some more time to think about this issue I think we should
>> walk down the same road as cellar: using 2.x for karaf 2.x support and
>> 3.x for karaf 3 support (although this limits our version range
>> according to semver.org). An option around this problem might be to
>> add an additional version behind; e.g. starting with 2.0.0.0 and
>> 3.0.0.0 for the first releases; or in other words
>> KARAF.WC_MAJOR.WC_MINOR.WC_MICRO.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Łukasz Dywicki <l...@code-house.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Once again I back with WebConsole topic. As we plan to support bot 2.x
>>> and 3.x line. Current trunk (0.3.0-SNAPSHOT) of webconsole supports 2.x and
>>> I am about to start 3.x branch to get karaf trunk also supported. The
>>> problem is that we can not have the same version for both Karaf versions due
>>> changes in package names and so on. So the WebConsole must have two
>>> different versions, one for Karaf 2.x and second for 3.x.
>>>
>>> Another option is to make *core* of webconsole Karaf version agnostic,
>>> but then we still have submodules which have to support different versions
>>> of Karaf & OSGi runtime. Currently thing which breaks compability of 2.x vs
>>> 3.x is JAAS stuff and move of some packages to jaas.boot. In my opinion it's
>>> easier to manage release process with one version per branch, not like Aries
>>> does - a version per module.
>>>
>>> On IRC we had few options, one was classifier, another was to start with
>>> 2.x version for Karaf 2.x and 3.x for Karaf 3.x - just like we have with
>>> Cellar.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Lukasz
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbono...@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
Committer & Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin
<http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home> Commiter & Project
Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to