I think so too. If we ONLY backport real bugs and nothing else it would be quite minimal imho. Let the branches grow as needed :-) Kind regards, Andreas On Jan 16, 2013 6:09 PM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> 2.2.10 is a kind of particular, because it should have been a minor > release (and not a micro). > > Anyway, stop working on it and support is not the same thing IMHO. > > Let say, we get 2.4 out: > - we will work on 2.x branch (for 2.4.0, 2.5.0-SNAPSHOT, etc) > - we can "for transition purpose" support 2.3.x and 2.2.x: it's just bug > fixes on those branches. > > WDYT ? > > Regards > JB > > On 01/16/2013 05:57 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote: > >> Currently we are at 2.3.0 and 2.2.10. Does it mean that if we get out 2.4 >> to provide new features to our users, we will stop working on 2.2.x? >> How would this work when we get 3.0.0 out? >> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
