To my understanding the bugfix is just waiting to be applied. Therefore waiting for "another two month" isn't necessary, so we might very well just switch now.
Though releasing a 2.3.1 first is fine with me, which would result in a 2 month delay for the back port then ;) Just my .02 cents Achim Am 15.01.2013 20:46 schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <[email protected]>: > Just another thing: if we decide to "speed up" the minor number versioning > (more 2.5.0, 2.6.0, etc, which looks like a good idea to me), I think that > it makes sense to create a karaf-2.x.x branch in that case (and "minor" > branches only when it's required). > > My $.02 > > Regards > JB > > On 01/15/2013 05:53 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> +1, and actually I think we might just skip 2.3.1 and call it a 2.4 after >> this one is applied :D >> >> what do you think >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> 2013/1/15 Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> >> >> +1 on creating a 2.4 branch. >>> Personally I am ok at adding new features on micro releases as long as >>> they >>> don't change the API, especially considering the speed at which we bring >>> out new major and minor ones. >>> >>> -- >>> *Ioannis Canellos* >>> * >>> >>> ** >>> Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com >>> ** >>> Twitter: iocanel >>> * >>> >>> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
