I get your point.
The purpose of subshell is to avoid a huge number of commands,
especially when you type <TAB>.
Imagine when you add Camel, CXF, and other projects in Karaf: it's not
easy with the bunch of commands displayed.
In any case, if you know the commands, you can still use actual command
(like bundle:start, bundle:stop), no need to go into the subshell.
However, it's fair enough to start a discussion:
[1] I prefer to use subshell with completion on subshell
[2] I prefer to use subshell with global complete for all commands
Let see what the other users prefer.
Regards
JB
On 09/27/2013 02:39 PM, nseb wrote:
Yes, only if we are in subshell.
I still maintain that the system was better before because bcp more
interactive and what we call a shell.
Currently, we are developing bundles, I go through the installation of
feature, I have to check my bundle is properly activated, potentially make a
update or refresh a bundle, a bundle of test command, see the logs.
With the new method is tedious, before that I was faster because I
autocomplete from any location.
the shell mode loses much of its interest.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Tab-Completion-Trunk-tp4029755p4029763.html
Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
