Hey, I would still vote for a preview release. Other people might find other compatibility issues ( and I would love to have configadmin 1.8.14 in, for which a vote was started today)
Fabian On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I confirm the "jline" commands are now working fine. > > So, I will release 4.1.0. > > As part of the 4.1.0, I would like to include examples (I have some more > in preparation that I gonna merge) in the standard distribution: > > https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf/tree/DEV_GUIDE/examples > > We will improve and extend the examples (and dev guide) for 4.1.1. > > WDYT ? > > Regards > JB > > On 01/30/2017 11:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Guillaume fixed the shell backward compatibility this morning. >> >> I'm testing the fix now and if it's good, I will directly do a 4.1.0 >> release. >> >> Thanks ! >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 01/29/2017 01:38 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >>> A quick new update related to the first Karaf 4.1.x release. >>> >>> 1. Jenkins build >>> I fixed the Jenkins jobs for both master and karaf-4.0.x: >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/K/view/Karaf/ >>> >>> I also removed the job for karaf-3.0.x. >>> >>> The build are now fully OK, including itests. >>> It's important to keep this build clean. I encourage you to check the >>> result of the build after your commits. If you have any doubt before >>> committing, we still have the PR validation job. So, you can create a >>> pull request that will be validated by Jenkins. Then, you can merge your >>> PR branch. >>> >>> 2. Shell command issue >>> Several projects providing shell commands (like Camel, ActiveMQ, ...) >>> directly use jline dependency. It's pretty bad (they should use the >>> Karaf "wrapper), and, as Karaf 4.1.x now uses JLine 3.x, those commands >>> don't work in Karaf 4.1.x. >>> Here, we have two solutions: >>> 2.1. We create the jline "2.x" compliant packages in Karaf (in a bundle >>> as part of the shell-compat feature for instance). It's only a >>> workaround but should fix the issue. >>> 2.2. jline 3.x can provide a "compat" bundle with the jline 2.x packages >>> name, wrapping the jline 3.x ones. It's probably the most elegant >>> solution, but it's require a new jline 3.x release. >>> >>> 3. Version & Schedule >>> Basically, I planned to release 4.1.0-M1 version today, as shell command >>> "break" is pretty bad. I'm postponing the decision to tomorrow evening. >>> I plan to discuss with Guillaume tomorrow about the jline 3 and shell >>> commands issue. If we can find a good solution, and release jline 3.1.3 >>> tomorrow, then, I will release Karaf 4.1.0 tomorrow evening. >>> If it's more complex and requires more time, then, I will release >>> 4.1.0-M1 tomorrow evening, the 4.1.0 (GA) will be released 3 weeks >>> later, giving time for us to fix the jline/command issue. >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 01/29/2017 11:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> the problem is clearly an incompatible version of jline (resulting of >>>> the update we did in Karaf 4.1.x). It breaks other projects which are >>>> using directly jline (for completer for instance). >>>> >>>> So, the other projects should be refactored (camel, activemq, ...) to >>>> not relay on jline but Karaf (for the completer for instance). >>>> >>>> Anyway, it means that Karaf 4.1.0 is not yet ready to support any other >>>> projects. >>>> >>>> So, I'm going to 4.1.0-M1 first and we will invite maximum of people to >>>> test on this milestone in order to clearly identify the breaking changes >>>> and provide max backward compatibility when possible. >>>> >>>> I already changed the version in Jira and I will cut 4.1.0-M1 later >>>> today. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On 01/28/2017 03:32 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> as you might know, I'm preparing the Karaf 4.1.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> We are mostly ok, but during my tests, I found that Camel (at least >>>>> 2.18.1) commands are not available in the shell. >>>>> >>>>> I suspect because they use the "old" style. >>>>> >>>>> I also see lot of small annoying behaviors in the shell console (on >>>>> completion especially). >>>>> >>>>> So, even we are mostly ready, I'm not sure it's fully ready for >>>>> production. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of directly releasing Karaf 4.1.0, I propose to release >>>>> 4.1.0-M1 >>>>> as a tech preview. I would allow people to review and test 4.1.0-M1 but >>>>> give a good message that's a tech preview. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On 01/05/2017 03:39 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> I started the updates and fixes for Karaf 4.1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> As dependencies, we will need Pax Exam 4.10.0 and Pax Web 6.0.1. Achim >>>>>> and I will tackle this as it's pre-requisite for 4.1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> I plan to create karaf-4.1.x branch next week for a release the >>>>>> following week. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
