But please don't use "trunk" - these days should be long gone ;) regards Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 27 lip 2020 o 16:19 Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> napisał(a): > wow I didn't think of the git branch name ! > > But default seems to make more sense than main to me. > > Regards, > Serge... > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > > We can rename the branch anyway. > > > > I guess they gonna change the "default" soon. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > Le 27 juil. 2020 à 16:06, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > > > > > Isn't "master" hardcoded in `git` binary - when you create an empty git > > > repo? > > > > > > $ cd /data/tmp/ > > > $ mkdir x > > > $ cd x > > > $ git init > > > Initialized empty Git repository in /data/tmp/x/.git/ > > > $ git branch -vv > > > $ git commit --allow-empty -m 'Initial commit' > > > [master (root-commit) f402a8e] Initial commit > > > $ git branch -vv > > > * master f402a8e Initial commit > > > > > > regards > > > Grzegorz Grzybek > > > > > > pon., 27 lip 2020 o 15:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> > > napisał(a): > > > > > >> It sounds good, main is fine. > > >> > > >> I will do the rename and update documentation/website. > > >> > > >> Regards > > >> JB > > >> > > >>> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 14:55, Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > > > > > >> a écrit : > > >>> > > >>> May be we could use the new github default branch name "main". > > >>> > > >>> regards, > > >>> > > >>> François > > >>> fpa...@apache.org > > >>> > > >>> Le 27/07/2020 à 14:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > >>>> Yes, I forgot to mention this. I was about to propose develop branch > > >> instead of master branch. > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards > > >>>> JB > > >>>> > > >>>>> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 14:37, Francois Papon < > > francois.pa...@openobject.fr> > > >> a écrit : > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Should we also rename "master" branch on git? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> regards, > > >>>>> > > >>>>> François > > >>>>> fpa...@apache.org > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Le 27/07/2020 à 13:57, Achim Nierbeck a écrit : > > >>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> and wherever it fits best. > > >>>>>> Make sure the documentation is aligned, and maybe we could give > > hints > > >> in > > >>>>>> the current documentation already? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> regards, Achim > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Fabian Lange < > > >>>>>> lange.fab...@gmail.com>: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> as a user of karaf 4.2 building our own distribution, we would be > > >> okay with > > >>>>>>> this being even in 4.2.x > > >>>>>>> Even when not backwards compatible > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Fabian > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > > >> j...@nanthrax.net> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Hi guys, > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I would like to propose new wording in some Karaf designs: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> - In Karaf runtime, I would like to rename master/slave to > > >>>>>>>> primary/secondary > > >>>>>>>> - in Cellar, I would like to rename blacklist/whitelist to > > >> allowlist and > > >>>>>>>> deny list > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Thoughts ? > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Regards > > >>>>>>>> JB > > >> > > >> > > > > >
