No way ;) trunk is for old guys ;) Regards JB
> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 16:37, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > But please don't use "trunk" - these days should be long gone ;) > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > pon., 27 lip 2020 o 16:19 Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org> napisał(a): > >> wow I didn't think of the git branch name ! >> >> But default seems to make more sense than main to me. >> >> Regards, >> Serge... >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:08 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> We can rename the branch anyway. >>> >>> I guess they gonna change the "default" soon. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>>> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 16:06, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> a >>> écrit : >>>> >>>> Isn't "master" hardcoded in `git` binary - when you create an empty git >>>> repo? >>>> >>>> $ cd /data/tmp/ >>>> $ mkdir x >>>> $ cd x >>>> $ git init >>>> Initialized empty Git repository in /data/tmp/x/.git/ >>>> $ git branch -vv >>>> $ git commit --allow-empty -m 'Initial commit' >>>> [master (root-commit) f402a8e] Initial commit >>>> $ git branch -vv >>>> * master f402a8e Initial commit >>>> >>>> regards >>>> Grzegorz Grzybek >>>> >>>> pon., 27 lip 2020 o 15:21 Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> napisał(a): >>>> >>>>> It sounds good, main is fine. >>>>> >>>>> I will do the rename and update documentation/website. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>>> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 14:55, Francois Papon < >> francois.pa...@openobject.fr >>>> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> May be we could use the new github default branch name "main". >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> François >>>>>> fpa...@apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 27/07/2020 à 14:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : >>>>>>> Yes, I forgot to mention this. I was about to propose develop branch >>>>> instead of master branch. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 14:37, Francois Papon < >>> francois.pa...@openobject.fr> >>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Should we also rename "master" branch on git? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> François >>>>>>>> fpa...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 27/07/2020 à 13:57, Achim Nierbeck a écrit : >>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and wherever it fits best. >>>>>>>>> Make sure the documentation is aligned, and maybe we could give >>> hints >>>>> in >>>>>>>>> the current documentation already? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Fabian Lange < >>>>>>>>> lange.fab...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> as a user of karaf 4.2 building our own distribution, we would be >>>>> okay with >>>>>>>>>> this being even in 4.2.x >>>>>>>>>> Even when not backwards compatible >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Fabian >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 8:22 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre < >>>>> j...@nanthrax.net> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I would like to propose new wording in some Karaf designs: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> - In Karaf runtime, I would like to rename master/slave to >>>>>>>>>>> primary/secondary >>>>>>>>>>> - in Cellar, I would like to rename blacklist/whitelist to >>>>> allowlist and >>>>>>>>>>> deny list >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
