Hello - Allowlist/Denylist: +1 - I have no opinion on leader/primary/active, though active/passive sounds most natural to me. "master" branch - initially I thought it's not an issue, as there are no "slave" branches. But I read[1] and I think it's a good idea. "main" branch" seem in line with "main()" function. "trunk" is SVN thing and "default" reminds me of the "index.html" vs "default.asp" debate hundreds of years ago...
regards Grzegorz Grzybek --- [1]: https://www.zdnet.com/article/github-to-replace-master-with-alternative-term-to-avoid-slavery-references/ wt., 28 lip 2020 o 11:42 Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> napisał(a): > How about leader / follower instead of master / slave? > > Allowlist / denylist sounds good. > > Christian > > Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 08:22 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre < > j...@nanthrax.net>: > > > Hi guys, > > > > I would like to propose new wording in some Karaf designs: > > > > - In Karaf runtime, I would like to rename master/slave to > > primary/secondary > > - in Cellar, I would like to rename blacklist/whitelist to allowlist and > > deny list > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > -- > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Computer Scientist > http://www.adobe.com >
