Hello Great to hear about Karaf5 progress. Do I understand correctly that you think about `K5` branch in apache/karaf repo? If there's no common history, why simply not https://github.com/apache/karaf5 ?
regards Grzegorz Grzybek pon., 7 lut 2022 o 08:25 Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> napisał(a): > Of course ;) > > On 07/02/2022 08:22, JB Onofré wrote: > > Let’s wait for others feedback on the mailing list. > > > >> Le 7 févr. 2022 à 08:08, Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> > a écrit : > >> > >> I can manage the creation of the branch and move the code source. > >> > >> regards, > >> > >> François > >> > >>> On 07/02/2022 08:05, Francois Papon wrote: > >>> +1, we can use a dedicated branch :) > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> > >>> Francois > >>> > >>>> On 07/02/2022 08:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> It sounds good to me. > >>>> > >>>> The K5 repo is currently on my GitHub: > >>>> > >>>> https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf5 > >>>> > >>>> I propose: > >>>> > >>>> 1. To keep main for karaf-4.4.x for now > >>>> 2. Fix K4 like assembly on K5 (just have to push some new services) > >>>> 3. Push Karaf 5 on K5 branch > >>>> 4. Improve documentation on K5 branch to show what’s a service, and > so, allow anyone to contribute service/distribution > >>>> > >>>> ETA: end of this week if no objection. > >>>> > >>>> Regards > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> Le 7 févr. 2022 à 07:56, Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr> a écrit : > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> As we have some users that asking questions about Karaf 5 the next > Karaf generation, I think it would be nice to move the current repo to > master. > >>>>> > >>>>> It could be a good booster if we want to move forward on this for a > first RC. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thoughts? > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> François > >>>>> >
