Yes the first plan is karaf-5.x branch on karaf repo (not a new repo). 
I think it’s better in term of visibility and roadmap. 

Regards 
JB

> Le 7 févr. 2022 à 08:31, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello
> 
> Great to hear about Karaf5 progress. Do I understand correctly that you
> think about `K5` branch in apache/karaf repo? If there's no common history,
> why simply not https://github.com/apache/karaf5 ?
> 
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
> 
> pon., 7 lut 2022 o 08:25 Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>
> napisał(a):
> 
>> Of course ;)
>> 
>>> On 07/02/2022 08:22, JB Onofré wrote:
>>> Let’s wait for others feedback on the mailing list.
>>> 
>>>> Le 7 févr. 2022 à 08:08, Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>
>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> I can manage the creation of the branch and move the code source.
>>>> 
>>>> regards,
>>>> 
>>>> François
>>>> 
>>>>> On 07/02/2022 08:05, Francois Papon wrote:
>>>>> +1, we can use a dedicated branch :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Francois
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 07/02/2022 08:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It sounds good to me.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The K5 repo is currently on my GitHub:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/jbonofre/karaf5
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I propose:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 1. To keep main for karaf-4.4.x for now
>>>>>> 2. Fix K4 like assembly on K5 (just have to push some new services)
>>>>>> 3. Push Karaf 5 on K5 branch
>>>>>> 4. Improve documentation on K5 branch to show what’s a service, and
>> so, allow anyone to contribute service/distribution
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ETA: end of this week if no objection.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le 7 févr. 2022 à 07:56, Francois Papon <
>> francois.pa...@openobject.fr> a écrit :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> As we have some users that asking questions about Karaf 5 the next
>> Karaf generation, I think it would be nice to move the current repo to
>> master.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It could be a good booster if we want to move forward on this for a
>> first RC.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> François
>>>>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to