IMHO, Camel is slightly different as camel repo is used by camel-k, camel-quarkus (it's kind of core/common lib).
However, we have a consensus: we don't rename karaf, we just rework the website to give space to all projects. If there is no objection, I will start a formal vote tomorrow with: - create karaf-minho repo - donate code from my github here - rework the website I will start to rename all on my github to use org.apache.karaf.minsho space. Regards JB On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:15 AM Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello (also a bit late) > > niedz., 9 paź 2022 o 12:46 Achim Nierbeck <bcanh...@googlemail.com.invalid> > napisał(a): > > > a bit late to the party, nevertheless I'm also in favor of making it > > crystal clear that Karaf is for OSGi and Karaf Minho is the new kid in > > town. > > > > I agree. Same as with Camel - there's "Camel", "Camel-K" and > "Camel-Quarkus". Original Camel wasn't renamed ;) > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > > > besides that I'm also in favor of accepting this new runtime into the karaf > > community. > > > > regards, Achim > > > > Am So., 9. Okt. 2022 um 09:13 Uhr schrieb Serge Huber <shu...@apache.org>: > > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 9, 2022 at 7:50 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > That's correct. > > > > > > > > My proposal is really more for the website and "marketing". > > > > > > > > If you go there: https://karaf.apache.org/projects.html > > > > > > > > You can see we have: > > > > - Karaf runtime > > > > - Karaf cellar > > > > - Karaf cave > > > > - Karaf decanter > > > > > > > > So, basically, nothing change so much with my proposal. We would have: > > > > - Karaf OSGi runtime > > > > - Karaf Minho runtime > > > > - Karaf Cellar > > > > - Karaf Cave > > > > - Karaf Decanter > > > > - Karaf Winegrower > > > > > > > > Each subproject will have a dedicated subsite (with their own > > > > documentation, etc, ...). > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > JB > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 4:20 PM Steinar Bang <s...@dod.no> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Eric Lilja <mindcoo...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > Because it's shedding its OSGi core, making it optional. It's a > > > > different > > > > > > product stack. > > > > > > > > > > What I meant: K5 is something different so call it something > > different, > > > > > but leave the karaf 4.x line with the name "karaf". > > > > > > > > > > (And in a different place in the thread it seems like this is the > > > > > current plan...?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Apache Member > > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > > OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & > > Project Lead > > blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> > > Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> > >
