Hey folks!

Last community meeting we had this topic pending regarding the
communication of opening issues.

I understand that we must use kie-issues now for opening issues and not an
internal JIRA anymore. Great! I like GH issues more. Although, I have a few
Qs and observations:

1) Why use a central repository for opening issues and not opening issues
in the respective repository? This is the convention, and each repo might
have different requirements. Like adding different labels or bots. Having a
central repo for issues seems an anti-pattern.
2) Can't we have templates when opening issues? How do we communicate to
the community how to open issues? If we go with this central issues repo,
then we need to communicate in each repo that issues can't be opened there.
Or at least disable the issues tab via .asf.yaml file. This passes a weird
message to the community, IMO. The first impression is that we might not
accept issues. A newcomer will have to look for a contrib/readme file to
find where to open.
3) Do we have to migrate internal opening JIRAs to GH Issues? If so, can we
do it as we start working on them instead of a batch migration?

Thank u!
--
Zanini

Reply via email to