Hi Alex, I think Quarkus-jdbc-oracle can be scoped to test. Can you try it?
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < [email protected]> wrote: > It is fine then to remove it. That means it is required to remove > those modules we support using oracle as well (unfortunately). > I am ok removing it all at once. > +1 > > El vie, 26 ene 2024 a las 19:08, Tibor Zimányi (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > > Thank you for the investigation Alex! With what you wrote, I personally > > agree we should remove all the relevant code. I think even if it would > > somehow work, it would still be a potential legal problem, so better to > > remove all of it. It is in git history, so if someone would like to > revive > > it, it is there. > > > > Best regards, > > Tibor > > > > Dňa pi 26. 1. 2024, 19:03 Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> napísal(a): > > > > > Coming back here with an updated PR [1] [2] set following the proposed > > > concept to exclude the minimal possible amount of code.... > > > Unfortunately it won't work. > > > > > > Although pointed out that the existing effective code (not test) > > > didn't require the JDBC, is not exactly accurate as you can see here > > > [3] with the quarkus-jdbc-oracle (which brings the oracle driver as > > > dependency). Once this dependency is removed, the module fails in > > > compile time (quarkus/hibernate process the application.properties in > > > compile time). I've tried all sorts of combinations in the > > > application.properties, but all of them result in the same compilation > > > failure by Quarkus. > > > > > > If the above description is true and there is no alternative, I think > > > we can agree that preserving the Oracle code won't have only no tests, > > > but will also mislead users with a jar that says "oracle-quarkus" that > > > won't work. If this situation holds true, I'd prefer we completely > > > remove the Oracle dependency (code and tests). > > > > > > I'd love to hear your thoughts. > > > > > > [1] - > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3376 > > > [2] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969 > > > [3] - > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969/files#diff-65c393eaf9cd1897cec903ed11bee1706e53f938eb78d80520dcfbe364738ad6L44-L47 > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:39 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > I agree with Enrique. Removing the driver from poms would have been > > > enough. > > > > Im afraid we will have to redo the oracle stuff (it was not easy to > avoid > > > > code duplication with postgres) at some moment in the future. > > > > I commented on the PR on that regard. > > > > So, Im really wondering, and please do not take it wrong, given than > > > > Enrique and myself are the most active committer touching that code > > > > section, who agreed on that? > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:50 AM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Enrique, > > > > > > > > > > I might be interpreting the Category X dependency way too > strictly; but > > > > > it’s my current understanding that we cannot have such dependency > in > > > our > > > > > codebase at all. > > > > > > > > > > The direction that we agreed is to avoid endless discussion and > just > > > remove > > > > > for now; once we past the critical phase of our first release- we > can > > > try > > > > > to explore and discuss different angles to tackle the Category X > > > > > dependency; it’s just not worth spend time right now on it. > > > > > > > > > > Hope it clarifies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:21 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > I don't understand why the code and scripts from Oracle are being > > > > > > removed. If the only problem is the binary dependency I don't see > > > > > > remove code for oracle is required unless Oracle word is > something > > > > > > subject to not being used in Apache. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would suggest only to remove the dependencies and for the test > just > > > > > > execute it conditional only if the driver is available. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers :) > > > > > > > > > > > > El mié, 24 ene 2024 a las 0:00, Alex Porcelli (<[email protected] > >) > > > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Francisco and team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are the links for the PRs that remove references for > Oracle > > > > > > > database dependencies: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3369 > > > > > > > - > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1968 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:36 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the info.k > > > > > > > > Quarkus-oracle-jdbc dependency includes ojdbc11 and ori18n, > > > which I'm > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > sure are affected by this policy. > > > > > > > > However, kogito-test-utils includes oracle-xe, which seems > to be > > > > > > affected, > > > > > > > > so I'm wondering which should be the approach? Probably > removing > > > the > > > > > > driver > > > > > > > > and the test associated with it that will start failing > should be > > > > > > enough. > > > > > > > > Problem is that we will leave some functionality not tested > but I > > > > > guess > > > > > > > > that's ok, since, after > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1941, > > > > > oracle > > > > > > addon > > > > > > > > delegates to generic jpa addon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:17 PM Alex Porcelli < > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Based on this thread [1] and this legal issue feedback [2] > - > > > remove > > > > > > > > > Oracle driver is required to comply with Apache Foundation > > > > > > > > > requirements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I created the issue [3] and this is a blocker for release. > I'm > > > > > > > > > planning to work on this myself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/1t29vxrnhfxk63j4n6do6g8jhl6l858j > > > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-663 > > > > > > > > > [3] > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/817 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
