I'd -1 to remove functional code added by a community member. This would
pass the wrong message.

Can't we compromise on removing the module from our POM from now and have a
proposal to keep it in an external/sandbox repo shortly? So we won't
release now, we won't lose this code and we can potentially still have the
users for this component working on it.

I remember Camel had a `camel-ext` repo somewhere maintained by a
third-party org with components that would break ASF legal issues. Worked
great.

On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:06 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
[email protected]> wrote:

> The original proposal was to remove the driver and remove the test that use
> the driver. Thats precisely what the PR is doing.
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:05 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > This is not only code that is not tested, it's code that doesn't work
> > - this is beyond what was originally proposed.
> >
> > The original point to keep it was supposed that you could just drop in
> > classpath the jdbc driver and it would work, the current PR is far
> > from it.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 11:03 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > And in any case the PR achieves what we intended, removing the driver
> and
> > > disabling the test. We already knew the final situation will be a code
> > that
> > > is not tested.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:58 PM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > > I agree the situation is not ideal, but we know it at least compiled.
> > And
> > > > we can add a maven profile to enable the testing if needed (I can
> > modify
> > > > the PR to include the "erased" test is a special maven profile)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:10 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> My concern that by disabling quarkus and tests we have that a
> > misleading
> > > >> piece of code that won’t work in any form. The only way to make it
> > work is
> > > >> forking, changing code and build local.
> > > >>
> > > >> I think this could be much better handled as an external module that
> > any
> > > >> community member could host in their own personal organization.
> > > >>
> > > >> I struggle to see value on it;
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:53 AM Tibor Zimányi <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Francisco,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I checked your PR. What is the expected maintenance model for the
> > > >> disabled
> > > >> > tests and code around, please? Are there any volunteers, who will
> > > >> maintain
> > > >> > those disabled tests and code around those and make sure it works?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best regards,
> > > >> > Tibor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Dňa po 29. 1. 2024, 15:43 Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti <
> > > >> > [email protected]>
> > > >> > napísal(a):
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > I missed to upload some key modification in the pom file, sorry
> > about
> > > >> > that,
> > > >> > > please take another look
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 3:26 PM Alex Porcelli <[email protected]
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Francisco,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > My last PR looks exactly the same, but it fails to compile.
> Can
> > you
> > > >> > > clarify
> > > >> > > > how you managed to get quarkus not forcing on failing
> > compilation?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I think you also need to remove references in Kogito runtime
> > > >> > repository.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:10 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti
> <
> > > >> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > I opened PR
> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1971
> > > >> > > > > for data-index.
> > > >> > > > > Basically, the idea is to remove the quarkus dependency and
> > all
> > > >> > > > associated
> > > >> > > > > tests that require it.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 2:32 PM Alex Porcelli <
> > > >> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Sure! Please go ahead
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 8:30 AM Francisco Javier Tirado
> > Sarti <
> > > >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Ok,
> > > >> > > > > > > Can I try removing the driver without removing the code
> > > >> myself?
> > > >> > > > > > > I understood that as far as there is not references to
> the
> > > >> driver
> > > >> > > in
> > > >> > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > code base, we are fine, isnt it?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 1:58 PM Alex Porcelli <
> > > >> > [email protected]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Francisco,
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Modifying the scope to test won’t work, the
> compilation
> > will
> > > >> > > still
> > > >> > > > > > fail.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > But even if it could work, having test scope is still
> a
> > > >> LEGAL
> > > >> > > > > > violation,
> > > >> > > > > > > so
> > > >> > > > > > > > we can’t have it.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Regarding us moving this code somewhere else, it
> > creates a
> > > >> huge
> > > >> > > > grey
> > > >> > > > > > area
> > > >> > > > > > > > in my opinion. We, as Apache Committers have
> > > >> responsibilities
> > > >> > > with
> > > >> > > > > > > Apache.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Last option you mentioned was about having it in the
> > > >> codebase
> > > >> > > > without
> > > >> > > > > > > being
> > > >> > > > > > > > complied, this will create dead code and I’m heavily
> -1
> > with
> > > >> > this
> > > >> > > > > > option
> > > >> > > > > > > > (to not mention that this still a LEGAL issue - as the
> > > >> source
> > > >> > > code
> > > >> > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > still not be complying with Apache Foundation legal
> > > >> > > requirements).
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 6:33 AM Francisco Javier
> Tirado
> > > >> Sarti <
> > > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > And finally, as another alternative that was
> > suggested in
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > past
> > > >> > > > > (I
> > > >> > > > > > > > think
> > > >> > > > > > > > > was proposed by Enrique and Ricardo, but I do not
> > recall
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > > details
> > > >> > > > > > > > right
> > > >> > > > > > > > > now), we might set up a "non supported extension
> > repo",
> > > >> where
> > > >> > > we
> > > >> > > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > > move
> > > >> > > > > > > > > all addons we have "issues" with, like this one.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > The reason I am reluctant to completely remove this
> > one is
> > > >> > that
> > > >> > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > was
> > > >> > > > > > > > > originally added by community folks in their spare
> > time
> > > >> and I
> > > >> > > > > worried
> > > >> > > > > > > > about
> > > >> > > > > > > > > how it would look like for them ( I don't really
> know
> > is
> > > >> they
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > > > > still
> > > >> > > > > > > > > using it or not, to be honest)
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:27 PM Francisco Javier
> > Tirado
> > > >> > Sarti
> > > >> > > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > If that is not not working, then I suggest
> removing
> > > >> Oracle
> > > >> > > > > related
> > > >> > > > > > > > > project
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > from the module list of the parent poms. That will
> > > >> prevent
> > > >> > > its
> > > >> > > > > > > > > deployment,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > but community will still have the code available
> for
> > > >> > > community
> > > >> > > > > > usage.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:14 PM Francisco Javier
> > Tirado
> > > >> > > Sarti
> > > >> > > > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> I think Quarkus-jdbc-oracle can be scoped to
> test.
> > Can
> > > >> you
> > > >> > > try
> > > >> > > > > it?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 9:32 AM Enrique Gonzalez
> > > >> Martinez
> > > >> > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> It is fine then to remove it. That means it is
> > > >> required
> > > >> > to
> > > >> > > > > remove
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> those modules we support using oracle as well
> > > >> > > > (unfortunately).
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> I am ok removing it all at once.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> +1
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> El vie, 26 ene 2024 a las 19:08, Tibor Zimányi
> (<
> > > >> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > >)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> escribió:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Thank you for the investigation Alex! With
> what
> > you
> > > >> > > wrote,
> > > >> > > > I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > personally
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > agree we should remove all the relevant code.
> I
> > > >> think
> > > >> > > even
> > > >> > > > if
> > > >> > > > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > somehow work, it would still be a potential
> > legal
> > > >> > > problem,
> > > >> > > > so
> > > >> > > > > > > > better
> > > >> > > > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > remove all of it. It is in git history, so if
> > > >> someone
> > > >> > > would
> > > >> > > > > > like
> > > >> > > > > > > to
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> revive
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > it, it is there.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Tibor
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > Dňa pi 26. 1. 2024, 19:03 Alex Porcelli <
> > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > napísal(a):
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Coming back here with an updated PR [1] [2]
> > set
> > > >> > > following
> > > >> > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> proposed
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > concept to exclude the minimal possible
> > amount of
> > > >> > > > code....
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Unfortunately it won't work.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Although pointed out that the existing
> > effective
> > > >> code
> > > >> > > > (not
> > > >> > > > > > > test)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > didn't require the JDBC, is not exactly
> > accurate
> > > >> as
> > > >> > you
> > > >> > > > can
> > > >> > > > > > see
> > > >> > > > > > > > > here
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [3] with the quarkus-jdbc-oracle (which
> > brings the
> > > >> > > oracle
> > > >> > > > > > > driver
> > > >> > > > > > > > as
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > dependency). Once this dependency is
> removed,
> > the
> > > >> > > module
> > > >> > > > > > fails
> > > >> > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > compile time (quarkus/hibernate process the
> > > >> > > > > > > > application.properties
> > > >> > > > > > > > > in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > compile time). I've tried all sorts of
> > > >> combinations
> > > >> > in
> > > >> > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > application.properties, but all of them
> > result in
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > > same
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> compilation
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > failure by Quarkus.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > If the above description is true and there
> is
> > no
> > > >> > > > > > alternative, I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > think
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > we can agree that preserving the Oracle code
> > won't
> > > >> > have
> > > >> > > > > only
> > > >> > > > > > no
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> tests,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > but will also mislead users with a jar that
> > says
> > > >> > > > > > > "oracle-quarkus"
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> that
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > won't work. If this situation holds true,
> I'd
> > > >> prefer
> > > >> > we
> > > >> > > > > > > > completely
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove the Oracle dependency (code and
> tests).
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > I'd love to hear your thoughts.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [1] -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3376
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [2] -
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > [3] -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1969/files#diff-65c393eaf9cd1897cec903ed11bee1706e53f938eb78d80520dcfbe364738ad6L44-L47
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:39 AM Francisco
> > Javier
> > > >> > Tirado
> > > >> > > > > Sarti
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I agree with Enrique. Removing the driver
> > from
> > > >> poms
> > > >> > > > would
> > > >> > > > > > > have
> > > >> > > > > > > > > been
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > enough.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Im afraid we will have to redo the oracle
> > stuff
> > > >> (it
> > > >> > > was
> > > >> > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > > easy
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to avoid
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > code duplication with postgres) at some
> > moment
> > > >> in
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > > > > future.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I commented on the PR on that regard.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > So, Im really wondering, and please do not
> > take
> > > >> it
> > > >> > > > wrong,
> > > >> > > > > > > given
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> than
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Enrique and myself are the most active
> > committer
> > > >> > > > touching
> > > >> > > > > > > that
> > > >> > > > > > > > > code
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > section, who agreed on that?
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 10:50 AM Alex
> > Porcelli <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Enrique,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > I might be interpreting the Category X
> > > >> dependency
> > > >> > > way
> > > >> > > > > too
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> strictly; but
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > it’s my current understanding that we
> > cannot
> > > >> have
> > > >> > > > such
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> dependency in
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > our
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > codebase at all.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > The direction that we agreed is to avoid
> > > >> endless
> > > >> > > > > > discussion
> > > >> > > > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> just
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > for now; once we past the critical phase
> > of
> > > >> our
> > > >> > > first
> > > >> > > > > > > > release-
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> we can
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > try
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > to explore and discuss different angles
> to
> > > >> tackle
> > > >> > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > Category
> > > >> > > > > > > > > X
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > dependency; it’s just not worth spend
> time
> > > >> right
> > > >> > > now
> > > >> > > > on
> > > >> > > > > > it.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Hope it clarifies
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 3:21 AM Enrique
> > > >> Gonzalez
> > > >> > > > > > Martinez <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I don't understand why the code and
> > scripts
> > > >> > from
> > > >> > > > > Oracle
> > > >> > > > > > > are
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> being
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > removed. If the only problem is the
> > binary
> > > >> > > > > dependency I
> > > >> > > > > > > > don't
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> see
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > remove code for oracle is required
> > unless
> > > >> > Oracle
> > > >> > > > word
> > > >> > > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> something
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > subject to not being used in Apache.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I would suggest only to remove the
> > > >> dependencies
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > > for
> > > >> > > > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> test just
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > execute it conditional only if the
> > driver is
> > > >> > > > > available.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Cheers :)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > El mié, 24 ene 2024 a las 0:00, Alex
> > > >> Porcelli
> > > >> > (<
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]>)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > escribió:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Hi Francisco and team,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Here are the links for the PRs that
> > remove
> > > >> > > > > references
> > > >> > > > > > > for
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Oracle
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > database dependencies:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-runtimes/pull/3369
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1968
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 6:36 AM
> > Francisco
> > > >> > > Javier
> > > >> > > > > > Tirado
> > > >> > > > > > > > > Sarti
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for the info.k
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Quarkus-oracle-jdbc dependency
> > includes
> > > >> > > ojdbc11
> > > >> > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > > ori18n,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > which I'm
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > sure are affected by this policy.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > However, kogito-test-utils
> includes
> > > >> > > oracle-xe,
> > > >> > > > > > which
> > > >> > > > > > > > > seems
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> to be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > affected,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > so I'm wondering which should be
> the
> > > >> > > approach?
> > > >> > > > > > > Probably
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> removing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > driver
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > and the test associated with it
> that
> > > >> will
> > > >> > > start
> > > >> > > > > > > failing
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> should be
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > enough.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Problem is that we will leave some
> > > >> > > > functionality
> > > >> > > > > > not
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> tested but I
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > guess
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > that's ok, since, after
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-apps/pull/1941
> ,
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > oracle
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > addon
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > delegates to generic jpa addon.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:17 PM
> > Alex
> > > >> > > Porcelli
> > > >> > > > <
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Based on this thread [1] and
> this
> > > >> legal
> > > >> > > issue
> > > >> > > > > > > > feedback
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> [2] -
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > remove
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Oracle driver is required to
> > comply
> > > >> with
> > > >> > > > Apache
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> Foundation
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > requirements.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I created the issue [3] and this
> > is a
> > > >> > > blocker
> > > >> > > > > for
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> release. I'm
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > planning to work on this myself.
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/1t29vxrnhfxk63j4n6do6g8jhl6l858j
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > >> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-663
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [3]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-issues/issues/817
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :)
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> > > [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > >> [email protected]
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to