Yeah, so, catching up on this, and I have to say, I don't understand any arguments to leave non-functional code that may not be in compliance behind. Any code that jeopardizes compliance needs to be removed, and workarounds created.
If there is a genuine concern that somehow, some way, this code might be used later, than that's what version control is for: go back to an older version and pick up the code from there. The other mentors may have different solutions, but if you can scrape out the driver (binaries and code) and the functionality won't break, then just do it. On 2024/01/29 16:14:10 ricardo zanini fernandes wrote: > I'd -1 to remove functional code added by a community member. This would > pass the wrong message. Sorry, it does suck, but sometimes people make honest mistakes and they might need correction. It's not a personal slight, especially when legal compliance pretty much overrules this situation. [snip] Brian Proffitt KIE mentor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
