I agree with all of this discussion. There are plenty of projects out there that have modules/integrations/whatever with various platforms and are not considered "part of" the platform. I think KIE ends up being the same thing. It runs on/with Quarkus and Spring Boot, but doesn't necessarily follow the same release cadence. I don't think we've been listed as part of the Quarkus ecosystem since version 2 of Quarkus. I don't know about Spring Boot.
I really think we grow faster making Spring Boot a first class integration for us. We'll get more people joining, using, helping, etc. On 2024/08/07 11:23:37 Alex Porcelli wrote: > Quarkus is a fast paced environment, we still struggle to release 10; > > Once we have a regular consistent release schedule we can better evaluate. > > +1 big time to raise SB3 as first class citizen before considering Quarkus > platform. > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 5:34 AM Francisco Javier Tirado Sarti < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Although it has not been our policy so far, from a community perspective I > > fully agree with Enrique, for the same reasons he argued. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 11:21 AM Enrique Gonzalez Martinez < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Tibor, > > > Honestly I don't think we should make the effort to publish our > > > extensions there (either quarkus or spring boot). This will tie us to > > > their lifecycle and that could be overkilling right now for us, as we > > > are moving towards GA. When the project is more mature I think there > > > might be room to do it, but right now I don't think we should be part > > > of those platforms., > > > > > > El mié, 7 ago 2024 a las 11:12, Tibor Zimányi (<[email protected]>) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > Hi Toshiya, > > > > > > > > thank you for opening this thread. I personally think, we should be > > part > > > of > > > > Quarkus platform. However I think the question should be broader. > > > Majority > > > > in the industry use Spring, so I think we should resolve this > > discussion > > > on > > > > a broader scale. I think Spring (and Spring Boot) should be a first > > class > > > > citizen too in our code the same way Quarkus is. So I think the > > > discussion > > > > should be about if we want KIE be part of both Quarkus platform and > > > > start.spring.io. > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > Dňa st 7. 8. 2024, 11:06 Toshiya Kobayashi <[email protected] > > > > > > > napísal(a): > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > Jan raised a concern > > > > > > > > > > > I'd check one thing here with the mailing list - if we still want > > to > > > > > perform any steps towards being part of that platform. I mean, fixing > > > > > pipelines is a good thing here, but I am not sure if we actually want > > > to > > > > > make it work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-kogito-pipelines/pull/1229#issuecomment-2268789394 > > > > > > > > > > It means "Do we want to keep kogito as a part of quarkus-platform?" > > > and if > > > > > the quarkus platform jobs should even exist. > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have thoughts on this? > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Toshiya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Saludos, Enrique González Martínez :) > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
