Folks,

Mario pointed this PR on main:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/commit/7d11b928a43b3f47bda6aac9ae4f79000d3ece72#diff-3996befe028d9a45cdd34de663ca46540723ace560396ac3af8b880ba47332eaL81
.

I applied the pom.xml changes to remove the profiles and add this
dependency:

"""
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
      <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
    </dependency>
"""

It worked for this module, but now it's failing ahead:

"""
[INFO] --- enforcer:3.0.0-M2:enforce (no-managed-deps) @
kie-dmn-core-jsr223 ---
[WARNING] Rule 0: org.commonjava.maven.enforcer.rule.EnforceManagedDepsRule
failed with message:
The following 1 dependencies are NOT using a managed version:

  - org.openjdk.nashorn:nashorn-core:jar
"""

@ Mario, I believe your fix worked, but we could also review other modules?

Cheers!

On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 2:58 AM Gabriele Cardosi <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all
> drools/build-parent/pom.xml#399
>
>  <dependency>
> >         <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> >         <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> >         <version>${version.org.glassfish.jaxb}</version>
> >
>
> Regards,
> Gabriele
>
>
> Il giorno lun 30 set 2024 alle ore 04:16 Toshiya Kobayashi <
> [email protected]> ha scritto:
>
> > Hmm, I downloaded the zip file again to ensure it is the latest
> > version. Then I tried the steps.
> >
> > I didn't hit the error and the build was successful. Can someone
> > double-check?
> >
> > It looks to me that kie-pmml-compiler-api/pom.xml uses a managed version.
> > ```
> >   <profiles>
> >     <profile>
> >       <id>java11-pmml</id>
> >       <activation>
> >         <jdk>[11,)</jdk>
> >       </activation>
> >       <dependencies>
> >         <dependency>
> >           <groupId>org.glassfish.jaxb</groupId>
> >           <artifactId>jaxb-runtime</artifactId>
> >         </dependency>
> >       </dependencies>
> >     </profile>
> >   </profiles>
> > ```
> >
> > Regards,
> > Toshiya
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 8:11 AM ricardo zanini fernandes <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys!
> > >
> > > While building drools I'm getting the following error:
> > >
> > > """
> > > [INFO] --- enforcer:3.0.0-M2:enforce (no-managed-deps) @
> > > kie-pmml-compiler-api ---
> > > [WARNING] Rule 0:
> > org.commonjava.maven.enforcer.rule.EnforceManagedDepsRule
> > > failed with message:
> > > The following 1 dependencies are NOT using a managed version:
> > >
> > >   - org.glassfish.jaxb:jaxb-runtime:jar
> > > """
> > >
> > > The build failures there and skip the rest.
> > >
> > > What I did was:
> > > 1. Download the rc1 zip, unzip, cd into drools
> > > 2. Run git init
> > > 3. Run  mvn clean install -DskipTests -Dfull
> > >
> > > Cheers!
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 2:22 AM Toshiya Kobayashi <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I recommend running the RAT tool: https://creadur.apache.org/rat/
> > and
> > > > checking things for headers, NOTICE files, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you, I was not aware of the tools and it was already configured
> > in
> > > > pom.xml.
> > > >
> > > > When I run `mvn apache-rat:check` for drools, it reported that there
> > are
> > > > some missing license headers. I filed a GH issue and PR.
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/issues/6098
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-kie-drools/pull/6099
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Toshiya
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 6:12 AM Tiago Bento <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure how other projects do it, but I'm guessing the process
> > of
> > > > > publishing a release candidate for public consumption is different
> > > > > from a proper final release... From what I understand, release
> > > > > candidates published to
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kie/10.0.0-rc1,
> if
> > > > > approved, need to be the exact same artifacts as the ones that will
> > > > > compose the final release. For this reason, we can't have "release
> > > > > candidate" artifacts with the `-rcX` prefix as their version, since
> > > > > they need to be, bit by bit, equal to the release itself.
> > > > >
> > > > > When one of our release candidates is approved both by us and the
> > > > > IPMC, the process of publishing it as a final release will be
> > creating
> > > > > a tag `10.0.0` pointing to the exact same commit as the
> `10.0.0-rcX`
> > > > > tag. Same is true for the artifacts. Our release publishing
> > automation
> > > > > will download from
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kie/10.0.0-rc1/
> and
> > > > > push to whatever places each artifact is released to (E.g., NPM,
> > > > > DockerHub, OperatorHub, VS Code Marketplace, Chrome Web Store etc).
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 2:03 PM Jason Porter <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I recommend running the RAT tool:
> https://creadur.apache.org/rat/
> > > and
> > > > > checking things for headers, NOTICE files, etc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2024/09/24 09:23:20 Toshiya Kobayashi wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It's great that we see incubator-kie-10.0.0-rc1-sources.zip in
> > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/kie/10.0.0-rc1/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now should we verify the sources.zip?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If yes, what should we test?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think of:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Build the project
> > > > > > > - Run all unit tests
> > > > > > > - Run my own application (which uses the 10.0.0 jars as
> library)
> > > and
> > > > > > > confirm if it works
> > > > > > > - Build and compare checksum with artifacts under
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekie-1005/
> > > > > ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Anyone, feel free to share your thoughts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just FYI for drools, I have done archetypes and kjar tests as
> > > sanity
> > > > > checks
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RP64VxjAbdWQX-w2ZgnAFSDdaoheJapIFdp29TFc5w0/edit?gid=0#gid=0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Toshiya
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to