Hey Kevin,

I don't think it's a blocker since you guys have released before. 0.3.1
can go out post graduation (or during or after) and they are independent.

Thanks and sorry I've been out of touch. I thought I could move from
Rancho Cucamonga, CA to Pasadena, CA take on a whole bunch more work
at JPL and other stuff and not see any drop-off. Hah!

I'm slowly coming back from the fog now and will be here to see this
project to its graduation!

Cheers,
Chris



-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 11:28 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduation Vote Schedule (was Re: Project bylaws?)

>Chris,
>I'd love to start the process you outline.  We ran into some
>NOTICE/LICENSE file feedback about our 0.3.1 release.  Should we take
>care of that before proceeding?
>Kevin.
>
>On 12/4/13 2:24 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
>> Agree to points #1, #2, and #3.
>>
>> Note that most projects simply agree to simple things like:
>>
>> 1. rotate the chair over some frequency of time X
>> 2. abide by Apache voting policies
>> 3. "be excellent to each other".
>>
>> Where are we in terms of the graduation?
>>
>> My proposal:
>>
>> 1. In the next 24 hours, I post up a draft graduation resolution
>> for [DISCUSS]
>> 2. In 72 hours I call a VOTE (community one) on graduating via
>> the resolution
>> 2a. if that vote passes, then we do 3
>> 3. Post community vote tally on general@incubator along with draft
>> resolution, vote there for IPMC
>> 4. If at least 3 IPMC +1s (from #2 or #3 or together) and more +1s
>> than -1s, it passes general@incubator VOTE after say 72 hours at least.
>> 5. We post passed resolution into board agenda hopefully in time
>> for board meeting in Dec 2013.
>>
>> Sound good?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Minder <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: "[email protected]"
>><[email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 7:24 AM
>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Project bylaws?
>>
>>> I agree that
>>> 1) this should not gate graduation
>>> 2) that we should avoid creating our own legalese
>>> 3) that we should link to something that outlines the guidelines under
>>> which we operate
>>>
>>> On 11/19/13 9:58 AM, larry mccay wrote:
>>>> My understanding is that it isn't required that we have our own
>>>>by-laws
>>>> and
>>>> that most projects don't bother.
>>>> It is assumed that you adopt the httpd by-laws (guidelines) in the
>>>> absence
>>>> of your own.
>>>> If we can avoid crafting, interpreting and discussing our own legalese
>>>> - I
>>>> think that would be best.
>>>>
>>>> That said - all contributors should be aware of the voting policy in
>>>> place
>>>> for our project.
>>>> A link to an authoritative definition of it - either in the httpd
>>>> project
>>>> (or ant for that matter) or to the glossary for definitions of
>>>> consensus,
>>>> etc would be good to have on our site.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Kevin Minder
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>> Several interesting threads occuring on general@incubator.  One of
>>>>>them
>>>>> is about bylaws/voting.  We probably need some more documentation
>>>>>like
>>>>> this
>>>>> for graduation.  From that thread, I thought the Ant bylaws (
>>>>> http://ant.apache.org/bylaws.html) were a good example.
>>>>> Kevin.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>>>> entity
>>>>> to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>>>>> confidential,
>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>>>>> reader
>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>>>>>notified
>>>>> that
>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>>>> immediately
>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>>>entity
>>> to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>>>reader
>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>>> that
>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>>> immediately
>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>
>
>-- 
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
>to 
>which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>that 
>any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>immediately 
>and delete it from your system. Thank You.


Reply via email to