+1 - Dan
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > OK, given it's not a regression does anyone strongly oppose moving forward > with 1.1.0 and try to squeeze 1.1.1 in in a couple weeks? In general my > philosophy is that each release should be at least as stable as previous > ones, but if we get into the habit of blocking releases because there's one > more bug found that's not in the release, then it will be hard to keep our > schedules. > > If no one -1s before tomorrow morning I'll close the vote and post the > release probably by mid-afternoon tomorrow PST. > > -Todd > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Jordan Birdsell < > jordantbirds...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Agreed with proceeding and doing a 1.1.1 release. > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 5:11 PM Dan Burkert <danburk...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Not a regression, it's been there since the add/drop range partitions > > > feature landed. > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry for radio silence on the vote thread so far -- been traveling > > this > > > > week. > > > > > > > > Is the range partition bug a regression or also present in 1.0? If > it's > > > not > > > > a regression i think it's reasonable to continue with the release and > > try > > > > to fix in a 1.1.1 along with a couple other late discovered bugs. > > > > > > > > Todd > > > > > > > > On Nov 17, 2016 6:50 PM, "Dan Burkert" <danburk...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dimitris Tsirogiannis just uncovered a bug that allows unintended > > range > > > > partitions to be dropped: KUDU-1750 > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-1750>. The bug allows a > > > range > > > > partition to be dropped if either the lower or upper bound range > > > partition > > > > key matches, instead of requiring both to match (it boils down to an > || > > > > where an && ought to be). I'm not sure whether this is high priority > > > > enough to sink the vote, but we should consider it. This could be > > > > construed as 'unintended data loss if the API is not used carefully'. > > > Fix > > > > is in review. > > > > > > > > - Dan > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Brock Noland <br...@phdata.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > > > > > Built on 7.2 and ran tests > > > > > > > > > > On Monday, November 14, 2016, Todd Lipcon <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > The Apache Kudu team is happy to announce the first release > > candidate > > > > for > > > > > > Apache Kudu 1.1.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > Apache Kudu 1.1 is a minor release which adds various new > features, > > > > > > improvements, bug fixes, and optimizations on top of Kudu 1.0. > > Please > > > > see > > > > > > the release notes for details. > > > > > > > > > > > > The is a source-only release. The artifacts were staged here: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/kudu/1.1.0-RC1/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Java convenience binaries in the form of a Maven repository are > > > staged > > > > > > here: > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekudu-1005/ > > > > > > > > > > > > It was built from this tag: > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=kudu.git;a=commit;h= > > > > > > 3f64b68724ded320a31b69467c5a5f7744b07a50 > > > > > > > > > > > > The release notes can be found here (some links from this > document > > > will > > > > > > only work when this version is released): > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/branch-1.1.x/docs/ > > > > release_notes.adoc > > > > > > > > > > > > KEYS file: > > > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/kudu/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd suggest going through the README, building Kudu, and running > > the > > > > > > unit tests. Testing out the Maven repo would also be appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > While voting, please note that there are some known test failures > > on > > > > RHEL > > > > > > 6: > > > > > > - sasl_rpc-test fails in ASAN builds due to a memory leak in > > > libkrb5.so > > > > > > - external_mini_cluster-test fails in RELEASE builds due to a bug > > in > > > > MIT > > > > > > Kerberos 1.10 (the workaround is in progress) > > > > > > These are test-only issues related to in-progress security work > > which > > > > is > > > > > > not yet supported in Kudu 1.1. Please disregard such failures > when > > > > > voting. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please try the release and vote; the vote will end in 72 hours > (on > > > > > > 11/17/2016 at 4:30pm PST). > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Todd > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
