>From my side, I cannot understand why you say Kylin 4 is 'very obviously'. Can you give an example? >From the source code, the basic logic of choosing the right cube/model are similar. ------------------------ With warm regard Xiaoxiang Yu
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 3:01 PM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn> wrote: > Thank you for your kind reply, please answer 1 more question about version > 5: > > In version 4.x we run query against a Cube very obviously, but in version > 5, the cube usage is a implication socan you advise: for a given query, > which model will be used, which index (cube) will be used for this query? > > Thank you > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:42 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote: > >> 1. How do I measure the size of the index (cube) in version 5? >> You can check storage of specific Indexes from the Index page. >> >> https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/docs/modeling/model_design/aggregation_group#view-aggregate-index >> or >> https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/assets/images/index_1-6ad3f55183d4ed61962359d9408ba192.png >> >> >> 2. How to create the cardinality for each column? >> You should check this link : >> https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/docs/datasource/data_sampling/ . >> >> 3. In your default project sample named SSB project, you have only 4 >> simple aggregate group index and no table index as in attached file >> so what is the best strategy to select index for our OLAP? >> 1. There does exist a 'Base Table Index' by default actually, its >> id is 20000000001. >> 2. I think it is a good question and Kylin 5 lacks such a guide for >> better modeling. You are free to ask your question to >> mailing list and I will try to reply. >> >> ------------------------ >> With warm regard >> Xiaoxiang Yu >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 2:12 PM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> OK, I didn't read all the mail history so I misunderstand the situation. >>> Looks like you need to analyse >>> the cause why the query didn't hit the cube correctly. >>> >>> Please generate query diagnosis package and send it to me privately. I >>> will analyse the query log. >>> You can refer to the following steps in screenshots. >>> >>> [image: image.png] >>> >>> If the screenshots are not displaying correctly, please read this guide : >>> >>> https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/docs/operations/system-operation/diagnosis/#generate-query-diagnosis-package-in-web-ui >>> >>> By the way, you need to analyse the cause by reading kylin.query.log, >>> not the kylin.log, >>> refer to https://kylin.apache.org/5.0/docs/operations/logs/system_log >>> >>> ------------------------ >>> With warm regard >>> Xiaoxiang Yu >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 12:18 PM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn> wrote: >>> >>>> Thank you Xiaoxiang for your advice. As my title email shown, I guessed >>>> that the OLAP functionalities has not been correctly set up in my computer. >>>> >>>> The evidence about it is that: when I disable the Pushdown option box >>>> to use solely the precomputation cube only, it showed following error: >>>> Please kindly advise how to properly build the OLAP >>>> >>>> LIMIT 500": No realization found for OLAPContext, MODEL_UNMATCHED_JOIN, >>>> rel#2240:KapTableScan.OLAP.[](table=[VNEVENT_HIVE_DWH_400MILLION_ROWS, >>>> FACTUSEREVENT],ctx=0@null,fields=[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, >>>> 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:40 AM Xiaoxiang Yu <x...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Yesterday, I tried to see if query pushdown functions work well in >>>>> the Kylin5 docker, and all of my queries return proper responses . >>>>> After checking your logs from Shaofeng, I found these error >>>>> messages repeated many times: >>>>> 1. 'java.io.IOException: All datanodes DatanodeInfoWithStorage[ >>>>> 127.0.0.1:9866,DS-5093899b-06c7-4386-95d5-6fc271d92b52,DISK] are bad. >>>>> Aborting...' >>>>> 2. 'curator.ConnectionState : Connection timed out for connection >>>>> string (localhost:2181) and timeout (15000) / elapsed (41794) >>>>> org.apache.curator.CuratorConnectionLossException: KeeperErrorCode = >>>>> ConnectionLoss' >>>>> >>>>> I guess the root cause is that the container didn't not have >>>>> enough resources. I found you query on a table called >>>>> 'XXX_hive_dwh_400million_rows', looks like you gave a complex query on a >>>>> table which contains 400 million rows? >>>>> >>>>> Since I am the uploader of kylin5 's docker image, I want to give >>>>> some explainment. Kylin5 docker is not a place for performance benchmarks, >>>>> it is only for demonstration. It is only allocated with very little >>>>> resources(8G memory) if you are using the default command from docker hub >>>>> page. Before I uploaded my image, I only tested my image using the ssb >>>>> dataset, which the biggest table only contains about 60k rows. If you are >>>>> using a larger dataset and complexer queries, you have to scale the >>>>> resource properly. Try querying tables which contain not more than 100k >>>>> rows by default. >>>>> >>>>> Here are some tips which may help you to check if the daemon >>>>> service is in health status and resources(particularly disk space) is >>>>> configured properly. >>>>> >>>>> 1. Checking HDFS 's web ui( >>>>> http://localhost:9870/dfshealth.html#tab-datanode ) to confirm >>>>> whether HDFS service is in 'In service' status. >>>>> 2. Checking Datanode 's log in >>>>> `/opt/hadoop-3.2.1/logs/hadoop-root-datanode-Kylin5-Machine.log`, check if >>>>> there is any error message. Like: cat >>>>> /opt/hadoop-3.2.1/logs/hadoop-root-datanode-Kylin5-Machine.log | grep >>>>> ERROR >>>>> | wc -l >>>>> 3. Checking if your docker engine is configured with enough disk >>>>> space, if you are using Docker Desktop like me,please go to "Settings" - >>>>> "Resources" - "Advanced", make sure you have allocated 40GB+ disk space to >>>>> the docker container. >>>>> 4. Checking the available disk space of your container by `df -h`, >>>>> make sure the 'Use%' of 'overlay' is less than 60% . >>>>> 5. Checking the load average/ cpu usage/ jvm gc. Make sure these >>>>> metrics are not really high when you send a query. >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> With warm regard >>>>> Xiaoxiang Yu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:13 PM Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn.invalid> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi ShaoFeng >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you very much for your valuable feedback >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw the application to be there (if I see it right) as in the >>>>>> attachment photo. Kindly advise so that I can run this query on OLAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> PS. I sent you the log file in private. >>>>>> >>>>>> [image: image.png] >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 3:11 PM ShaoFeng Shi <shaofeng...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you provide the messages in logs/kylin.log when executing the >>>>>>> SQL? and you can also check the Spark UI from yarn resource manager >>>>>>> (there >>>>>>> should be one running application called Spardar, which is Kylin's >>>>>>> backend >>>>>>> spark application). If the application is not there, it may indicates >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> yarn doesn't have resource to startup it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shaofeng Shi 史少锋 >>>>>>> Apache Kylin PMC, >>>>>>> Apache Incubator PMC, >>>>>>> Email: shaofeng...@apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apache Kylin FAQ: >>>>>>> https://kylin.apache.org/docs/gettingstarted/faq.html >>>>>>> Join Kylin user mail group: user-subscr...@kylin.apache.org >>>>>>> Join Kylin dev mail group: dev-subscr...@kylin.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nam Đỗ Duy <na...@vnpay.vn> 于2023年10月31日周二 10:35写道： >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Dear Sir/Madam, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a fact with 500million rows then I build model, index >>>>>>>> according to the website help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I chose full incremental because this is the first times I load data >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I create both index types Aggregate group index, table index as >>>>>>>> photo attached. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But the query always failed after timeout of 300 seconds (I run in >>>>>>>> docker), I dont want to increase the value of 300 seconds because I >>>>>>>> wish >>>>>>>> the OLAP can run within 1 minutes (is that possible?) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It seems that the OLAP function in indexing not working to speedup >>>>>>>> the query by precomputed cube. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can you advise to check whether the index did really work? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It is quite urgent task for me so prompt response is highly >>>>>>>> appreciated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you very much >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>
