Hi Pavel, On Tuesday, 2006-10-17 12:14:34 +0200, Pavel Janík wrote:
> > at this stage. Do we definitely need to translate m188 for now then, > > and will there be any further changes? > > this is a question to the development, not to l10n ;-) Sometimes, it > happens that some strings (or even features) land in the OOo source code > despite the fact that the feature and UI freeze happened... This is sad, > but true :-( I wonder where new/changed strings in m188, which isn't even ready yet, should come from. Querying EIS for CWSs with Release 2.1, Status integrated, UI yes, integrated after 2006-10-06, shows only CWSs integrated to m187. Querying for Release 2.1 and Status approved|nominated and UI yes also didn't reveal anything. So if there are new strings, someone didn't set the UI flag, which is bad but explains why a CWS wasn't scheduled for m187. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. Please don't send personal mail to this [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun, use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account instead if really needed. Thanks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]