Ain Vagula wrote: > Rafaella Braconi wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, >> >> very good point. The initial meeting I had in mind was on the l10n QA >> process. After some discussion I read on the lists, I thought that it >> was a good idea to have a meeting where to recap the QA process and its >> main steps and where the Community members have the possibility to ask >> questions and get - hopefully - immediate answers... >> >> For the meeting on the *translation process* or *central repository*, I >> suggest to have a separate meeting on Thursday, January 18th at 12:00 >> UTC / 13:00 CET. >> > > Good. I didnt mean at all to discuss about Pootle alone, but only in > context > *translation process* or *central repository*. Ie. Pootle exists and > works fortunately independent of our meetings :) > Maybe were better to remove this agenda point from 9. January meeting? >
Sorry, didnt read all posts, so lets count previous message as 'timed out'. ain PS. Cant we agree not use top-posting? This makes long threads almost unreadable :( --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
