Op Maandag 2007-10-15 skryf Olivier Hallot: > Hi, > Sorry to jump in so late... > > Pootle seems to be an interesting tool for pt-BR as well... but before > I ask to put pt-BR in it, I'll appreciate to have a glimpse into it's > future in the project. So, will pootle be the official translation tool > in the future or is there another tool under investigation. If > affirmative, why so many languages are out of it... > > What are the advantages and drawbacks for using pootle, specially for > editing and typing?. So far I was using po/pot with kbabel, but I tend > to think that tool needs improvement on big jobs such as the latest > translation update (2.4). Will pootle help us there besides not having > to deal with sdf files...? > > Thank you > Olivier > L10n lead for pt-BR
Hi Olivier Even if your team goes with Pootle, it is important to remember that you can still translate offline using your favourite translation program and then upload the files afterwards. There are a few different features, possibilities and limitations that are relevant for each tool, so Pootle is definitely not intended to constrain translation teams, but to help them. Some features of Pootle are mentioned on this page: http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/pootle/features I hope this helps. Keep well Friedel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
