Op Dinsdag 2007-11-13 skryf Aijin Kim: > Hi Jordi, > > > > > Aijin, > > > > There are a few translators that cannot use our Pootle server because > > it is at port 32300. Many people at their work places and universities > > have firewalls that block the access for this kind of ports. > > > > My suggestion is to consider changing the port to 80 as any regular > > web service if there are not technical reasons for not doing it. > I understand that the translators have a problem with the port 32300. > Currently, the Pootle server is in sunvirtuallab and unfortunately, the > port 80 is already used for TCM. I'm afraid that it's not easy to switch > port 32300 to 80. > > I think about an workaround. How about if they download the files from > Pootle where they can access Pootle and work off-line? Once translation > is completed, they can upload the contents. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Aijin >
Pootle can also run on a part of the URL. Is it possible to allocate part of the URL on port 80 to Pootle? For example sunvirtuallab.com/pootle/..... You will probably need to configure the web server to delegate the requests, but if the infrastructure allows, this could perhaps work. Keep well Friedel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
