Op Donderdag 2008-02-07 skryf Gregor Hartmann: > Hi, > > I am planing to change the sdf fileformat slightly. > > there is the 3. filed in every line which seems to be unused. > I would like to use it to store information like the new KeyID and other > things which will help to identify strings which will have to be > retranslated after the sourcestring has changed, but that is still to come. > > Anyways tzhe change would be to have a formated string in the 3. field > of the sdf file (right after the filename) > > It should look like this: > > > fieldname:fieldcontent;filed2:data2;field3:data3 > > and so on, as required. > > Would that break anybodys processes? > > If noone objects I would like to go on next week. > > Comments as always welcome. > > Thanks for your attention > Gregor >
>From what it sounds like, the Translate Toolkit will be unaffected. Will this become a compulsory field in the format? In other words, can we count on having this unique identifier? It might be worthwhile to then rather start using this identifier in our conversion process than the one we currently construct. We'll obviously need the community to help us test this so that we can continue with self confidence after the change. Friedel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
