Hi Jörg, Jörg Jahnke wrote: > Hi Sophie, > > sophie schrieb: >> Hi all, >> >> Further thinking near to the end of this round for 3.1, I would like to >> discuss possibilities of changes in the localization process. I'm not >> aware of the technical part with cws, so I may tell stupidities, and >> forgive me for that, but at least, I want to try :) >> >> If I question EIS, I found 7 cws containing UI and Help changes for 3.2, >> only one is yet nominated, none integrated. >> >> Won't it be possible to get an extraction of the strings every 3 of 4 >> snapshots and get them merged in Pootle then makes cws of them. > > You mean extraction of strings from "nominated" CWSs? That would be > possible. But you would normally only gain a few days that the CWS needs > to switch from "nominated" to "integrated". Currently we have a special > situation with a larger backlog of CWS, so that the time between these > two states is a bit higher.
ok, I thought that for new functionalities it will take more time. > >> Make those cws build by buildbots and merge those small cws in a final >> one called localizationxx? > > Ivo is working on a semi-automated process to build l10n CWSs, so that > such CWSs might be created more often than at the time. Btw., for this > goal it is not necessary to put data into Pootle from CWSs that are not > yet nominated. Thanks to Ivo :) I've read your second mail about Integrated instead of Nominated, why isn't it necessary, the cws won't content further changes? > >> >> Discussing with Andre he told me about that rsync of the cws may cause >> issues and integration of Pootle changes in the cws may be problematic >> also. >> The goal I think we all like to get at would be to have more time for >> translation and get aware of irrelevant parts or errors earlier, more >> time to test smaller translations, and may be proceed in smaller >> integration steps where we can check for translation from language packs >> delivered by buildbots. > > Agreed. This is exactly why Ivo, for quite some time now, is working on > the aforementioned process improvements. ok, thanks again Ivo. Kind regards Sophie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@l10n.openoffice.org
