-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58986/#review174017
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Puneet Gupta


On May 5, 2017, 11:17 a.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58986/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 5, 2017, 11:17 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for lens.
> 
> 
> Bugs: LENS-1418
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1418
> 
> 
> Repository: lens
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Using one lens client to fire two queries in two threads results in 
> discrepencies. LensClient has a {{Map<QueryHandle, LensStatement>}} and also 
> has a cached instance of {{LensStatement}}. When two threads fire queries, 
> both use the same statement object. {{LensStatement}} object in turn caches 
> {{LensQuery}} Object. So whichever thread fired query last is the last one to 
> set lens query inside statement causing 
> {{LensClient.getStatement().getQuery()}} to return that query object for all 
> threads.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   lens-cli/src/test/java/org/apache/lens/cli/TestLensQueryCommands.java 
> e1eaae5bde4718dc91982506a6b8619ff9872225 
>   lens-client/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/client/LensClient.java 
> e9367988fa780ed0ca3e2a2698226e43c011777f 
>   src/site/apt/user/cli.apt caffda7d60f3001883e4922096807fe07a939bab 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58986/diff/6/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rajat Khandelwal
> 
>

Reply via email to