----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62060/#review184519 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Ship It! - Puneet Gupta On Sept. 4, 2017, 12:50 p.m., Rajat Khandelwal wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/62060/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 4, 2017, 12:50 p.m.) > > > Review request for lens. > > > Bugs: LENS-1471 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LENS-1471 > > > Repository: lens > > > Description > ------- > > The issue is in Join candidates of the kind {{Join\[Union\[a,b\]; > Union\[a,c\]\]}}. If the instance of {{a}} is shared in different trees of a > JoinCandidate, the rewritten query will be wrong. JoinCandidate's children > set exclusive measure phrase indices, and that is done via truncate method of > list. So let's say union1 is answering {{\[0,1\]}} measures and union2 is > answering {{\[2,3\]}} measures, and since > {{\[0,1,2,3\].retain(\[0,1\]).retain(\[2,3\]) == \[\]}}, it ends up answering > no measures at all > > > Diffs > ----- > > > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/CandidateCoveringSetsResolver.java > 1cff4a424fddb7e124531837ce29a5d8ed97d49c > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/StorageCandidate.java > 27835b371c51579ae35d526fc6245f6cf5c7ffb4 > lens-cube/src/main/java/org/apache/lens/cube/parse/UnionCandidate.java > 510ea0c5b1edf1dd60b5380ba3b2a47844ed2219 > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/62060/diff/3/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Rajat Khandelwal > >
