On 2/4/06, Michael Wechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > Great that you start this discussion :-). As proposed I think we should > use http://wiki.apache.org/lenya/Glossary for writing > down the findings and discuss each term on this list individually. > > Michi > > > > > -- Andreas > >
I very much like where this talk is going. Terms are getting much more specific. BTWI think I was unclear earlier in what I meant by "Content Item" and its relationship to Document. I meant that both a Document and an Asset are each Content Items. I didn't mean for "Content Item" to mean the aggregate of a Document and its Assets. One thing, though: It isn't clear to me whether Jörn and Solprovider really agree on what a Document is. Jörn seems to be using Document as the aggregate/container term for both the editable text and the assets of a page. But Solprovider seems to be suggesting the words Resource or Content for that purpose. I wonder if we shouldn't promote "Asset" a little like this: A Document consists of Assets. An Asset can be any of the following: a German translation of the document, a French translation, a JPEG image, a PDF file, etc. All are assets. Collectively, they are a Document. This approach does away with the need for "Content Item" and helps us in treating assets just like other managed content, which several people have stated as a goal. +1 on using Revision instead of Version Also, I agree completely in using the Glossary wiki page; I didn't realize it existed. I will rename CMSTerminology to CMSTerminologyComparison and will remove the now-redundant definitions. I think Glossary should be used for both 1.2 and 1.4 terms, since most aren't changing. The differences between 1.2. and 1.4 definitions should be noted in their Glossary definitions. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
