Michael Wechner wrote: > Gregor J. Rothfuss wrote: > >> gang, >> >> we need to figure out what we want to do about the failed 1.2.5 >> release, and further 1.4 / trunk releases. >> >> clearly the lack of interest within a useful time frame for 1.2.5 is >> worrying. after all, this community has not had a release in about 18 >> months. >> >> i see a couple possible scenarios: >> >> a) we try again with 1.2.5 > > > +1 >
+1 becasue the 1.2 Branch is still recommended for a productive system. >> b) we retire the 1.2 branch > -1 see above! > > I would definitely first do (a) because it contains some improvements > and hence would be kind of lost > >> c) we release a new 1.4 release (a1 was the last one) > > > you mean a RC? > +1 Jann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
