Michael Wechner wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
no, i'm not talking about passing the data from a client browser. we
won't find a common denominator for that, since every editor is doing
it's own thing here.
and this is exactly what Neutron tries to solve. Instead writing for
each editor a dedicated connector implement Neutron once ;-)
i like the idea of neutron, but your argument is a little strange. i
might as well suggest that all editors implement a bxe-compatible mode.
(now that would be frightful indeed :)
but it's the same as with many things w3c: working drafts come cheap,
it's the implementations that make a new spec.
as nice as neutron seems, it does ring a warning bell that there are no
other implementations on the horizon. i don't mean to disrespect the
effort, but as it is now, it's just another single-vendor standard...
that said, i'm all for integrating a complete neutron implementation
into lenya, but it does not really address the current issue of editor
abstraction.
get the tinymce people to add a neutron front-end, and i will be dancing
naked on the streets shouting "michi, you da man!" :)
--
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
