Michael Wechner schrieb: [...]
> thanks for expressing your feelings and I will try to be more gentle, > but I am afraid that this won't help, I guess it would help - maybe not being more gentle, but being more direct and trying to avoid fallacies, comparisons, and emotional means of argumentation. > because it seems to me from your sentence above > you (and Thorsten and Gregor) are not able to differentiate between my > statements/questions and the feelings you have towards myself. I think you can't conclude anything about Thorsten and Gregor from my statement. As far as I'm concerned - I try not to be biased by personal emotions. I have the feeling that you see yourself in a corner, being misunderstood and attacked by other members of the community, and this might have lead to the problematic discussion style I mentioned above. We can't erase the past or neglect any emotions and experiences, so we should be especially careful about our style of writing. > I also think it's a pity, but you might want to try and ask yourself > honestly if it's different or not > resp. > you might want to re-read my original post > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.lenya.devel/20000 As I understand it, the discussion started to become emotionally problematic when you accused Thorsten of not wanting to tell his reasons for proposing Bob, thus violating the concepts of openness and transparency. Maybe you didn't intend to accuse him, but I understood the mail like this. It's absolutely fine to question a policy or guideline, but it would have been more tactful not to do this in a thread which involves particular people which could feel accused (Thorsten and Bob). I agree with Gregor's reply [1]. -- Andreas [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cms.lenya.devel/20023 -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
