On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 07:01 -0400, Bob Harner wrote: > On 8/22/07, Thorsten Scherler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 09:56 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· > > > > RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT > > > > <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43160>. > > > > ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· > > > > INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43160 > > > > > > > > Summary: Roadmap 2.0 > > > > Product: Lenya > > > > Version: 2.0 > > > > Platform: Other > > > > OS/Version: other > > > > Status: NEW > > > > Severity: normal > > > > Priority: P2 > > > > Component: Default Publication > > > > AssignedTo: [email protected] > > > > ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > Bugs we need to fix before releasing 2.0. > > > > > > wouldn't it be easier to just fix all bugs that have 2.0 as a target > > > milestone and are "major" or worse? could save a lot of bug tagging > > > work.... > > > > > > > you mean > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Lenya&target_milestone=2.0&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= > > ? > > This does it: > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Lenya&target_milestone=2.0&bug_status=__open__ > > Or the equivalent: http://tinyurl.com/ytvqcj :-) > > This is the list of bugs that we intend to fix before the 2.0 release. > The Priority tells you the importance, and anything that we don't > expect to fix before 2.0 should have its target changed accordingly. > So I'm with Jörn in not seeing a great need for a tracking bug in this > case, although I don't object to Thorsten maintaining it :-) >
Do you really think that this 19 bugs are all blocker for a release. IMO no and further I do not see that we will fix them within the time frame I suggested. The 43160 is an intend to limit the list to a doable most vital one. salu2 > > > > I opened this bug to better pin down the most important issues. > > > > salu2 > > > > > regards, > > > > > > jörn > > > > > > > > -- > > Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org > > Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
