On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:22 -0600, Richard Frovarp wrote: > Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > Richard Frovarp wrote: > > > >> Juergen Ragaller wrote: > >> > >>>>> BTW, shall we release a binary version at all? > >>>>> > >>> yes, I think so. > >>> > >>> Anything lowering the (rather high) entrance barrier is important - > >>> not everyone is a knowledgeable user at the beginning but getting an > >>> easy start without having to install another piece of software could > >>> trigger interest. > >>> > >>> > >> I agree. We had a discussion about this in the past and we decided that > >> a binary was good to have. > >> > > > > ok, so what should the binary distro look like? it's not like we can > > have an .exe file, right? so should we just package up the build/ tree > > together with a start script, or create a .war, or something entirely > > different? > > > > > > > > > I would just say everything need to run, which is a bit more the build I > think. Plus then a start script. A war would require them to have a > running application server. They should be able to download and run > lenya.sh or lenya.bat and have a chance to see the default publication. >
Actually we would need something like http://lenya.apache.org/docs/1_2_x/installation/index.html Meaning: * Lenya 2.0 Windows binary (Windows Installer) ASC Signature MD5 Checksum * Lenya 2.0 Windows binary (ZIP archive) ASC Signature MD5 Checksum * Lenya 2.0 Windows source code (ZIP archive) ASC Signature MD5 Checksum * Lenya 2.0 Unix binary (tar.gz archive) ASC Signature MD5 Checksum * Lenya 2.0 Unix source code (tar.gz archive) ASC Signature MD5 Checksum salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
