Hi Andreas
Am 08.02.2009 um 17:40 schrieb Andreas Hartmann:
Voting :
---------
The voting takes place on the user mailing list.
I suggest a star-system:
10 stars for committers
8 stars for persons with an apache.org email
6 stars for regular user/dev ml-posters (definition of ml posters
as described by solprovider)
Hmm, why are ASF committers from other projects higher valued than
regular Lenya contributors? IMO the merit in the Lenya project
should have a higher value …
I agree here.
4 stars for everybody else
It now boils down to:
10: commiters
8: regular user/dev ml-posters (definition of ml posters as
described by solprovider)
6: persons with an apache.org email
4: everybody else
[…]
Any entry can be vetoed by two -1 comming from committers
Committers participating in the contest loose their right to veto
I see your point, but this is a tricky situation. What if a
committer who participates in the contest has reasonable objections
against an entry (usability etc.)?
OK let's leave the right to vetoe in any case - to block an entry, two
vetoes are needed anyway.
BTW looks like a good training for democracy advocates...
Cancellation of the contest
------------------------------------
- less than 4(?) entries
- obvious misuse
+1 (maybe 3 entries would be sufficient?
Announcement
---------------------
I will do a search for appropriate blogs / design websites to
promote the contest a bit
Thanks! I'll be happy to do the same, maybe we have to coordinate
this a bit.
Shure - we could start on the wiki page.
Prices
--------
Meritocracy. - or maybe a sponsored price could still be nice; I'm
somewhat undecided about that
I don't think we need a price. People should have other motivations
to participate.
Ok let's leave it meritocratic.
Thanks for your feedback, Andreas
Jürgen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
