On Saturday 27 May 2006 03:07 am, Jonathon Blake wrote: > Eleonora wrote: > > This is fundamentally wrong. Noun classes or evidential grammar have > > absolutely nothing > > You hve allready proved that you know nothing about grmmatology.
Blake: you prove now before this list, that you not only do not know anything about grammar, but also have no idea about behaviour and simple English spelling. Sorry for you. If I were not right, you would give explanations and examples rather than arrogance and insults. > > Middle voice is not only in ancient greek. And it has very little to do > > with grammar checker. > > "Middle Voice" affects grammar. As such, it is something that needs > to be checked. Or are you not aware that words can change according > to voice? A marginal affection. Try to give examples, if you think, it is not marginal. > > without the slightest explanation, > > If a person needs basic grammar terms explained to them, on a thread > about implementing a grammar checker, or grammar API, the person is > not qualified to write either a grmmar checker, or grammar API. Your extreme arrogance is nice for you, since it tries to hide your lack of knowledge in grammar and of behaviour, right, Blake? If you use special grammatic terms, it is really a minimum requirement, that you explain, why are you using those terms, and you give examples. As you obviously know nothing about grammar, you are unable to do that. You prove open your inability, sorry for you. Blake, not to mention, that you are even unable to put together a simple dictionary, which is clearly a fundamental requirement for any spell checking, and that underlines your complete inabilty to argue about any kind of grammar checker, not to speak about grammar API. Regards: Eleonora --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
