Hi all,
> +1 (don't underline whole sentence). If we underlined the whole > sentence, many first-draft documents would be completely covered by > underlining! > > > we really need to discuss it... > if we underline the hole sentence we can use this method you mentioned > (right button), but if we encounter more than than two, for example > three or more it can be annoying to show everything in just one menu > (what do you think?). > > if we underline parts of sentences we can manage each error > independently, letting the start and end positions be defined by the > grammar checker (and remaped by API of course). +1 I think it would be real trouble for the user if a sentence of about 5 lines length (if only by error) got underlined in whole. Especially since consistently the replacement text for the whole sentence should be displayed. > * It should be possible to have both spell checkers and grammar > checkers enabled at the same time. If people choose to use grammar > checkers that have built-in dictionaries, they can choose to turn off > the spell checker, but I think the option to have both running should > be there. Still the question: Should a grammar checker always implement the spell checker API as well? It would be odd if there are a grammar checker and a spell checker with different ideas on if the word is wrong or how it should be corrected. Thomas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
