Hi,

First, I am happy, that you have made a much
better Swedish dictionary with Hunspell's compound handling.
I plan to implement a new feature in Hunspell to handle triple consonants in
special Swedish and Norwegian compounding (also with hyphenation).

The main problem is that we have no ``core'' developers
for Lingucomponent with CWS and Issue Tracker access.
Especially not official builds (like Swedish?) have
lack of maintenance.

I will update the English dictionaries next month,
and I hope I will be able to add Swedish dictionary, too.
But it would be much better if the maintainer of the Swedish build or you
could do it.

Now I added the dictionary to the Dictionary Wiki page:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries#Swedish_.28Sweden.29

With a little effort, you can make a pack file (see the last Swedish Pack file),
too. DicOOo maintainers can publish the pack file online, simply write a letter
to Laurent Godard or Daniel Naber.

Regards,

Laci


Quoting Lars Aronsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
> This concerns mostly the QA and distribution chain, but it has
> implications for the linguistic components as well.  As designers
> of spell checkers and other language tools, we need to see the
> whole environment in which they operate.
>
> In December a new Swedish dictionary was produced and ready for
> inclusion in OOo.  After much waiting, possibly misunderstandings,
> and reminders, it has now been scheduled (by "mh" [1]) for
> inclusion in OOo 2.3.  There are no licensing problems.  The only
> problem is that the previous Swedish dictionary (from 2003,
> actually very close to the Swedish ispell dictionary from 1997) is
> very poor, so the update is much needed.  In the timespan from
> December both version 2.1 and 2.2 of OOo have been missed.
>
> Can we now be sure that 2.3 will come out with the new dictionary?
> Can something go wrong, that delays this improvement further?
>
> How can we improve this release process so that future updates of
> the dictionary is handled faster?
>
> Is there still a chance to have the new dictionary included
> already in version 2.2?
>
> For users of operating systems with automatic updates (e.g. Ubuntu
> Linux), is there any way that OOo can give priority to such
> updates?  Right now I have no idea how the OOo-Ubuntu connection
> works.  My own standard Ubuntu installation still offers OOo 2.0.4
> and I have no clue when they are going to offer 2.1.
>
> When I'm lost in the dark without information, I take pleasure in
> conspiracy theories.  This time I added a note to the bugzilla
> that Sun Sweden has an interest in delaying the improvement of
> OpenOffice.  This is of course mere speculation, for which I have
> no proof.  It is however a fact that they market StarOffice in
> Swedish with the argument [2] that it has a professional grade
> spell checker, which OpenOffice so far hasn't had.  And it is a
> fact that this issue [1] was finally pushed forward only after my
> mentioning of Scott McNealy's name.  (That's a useful name.)
>
> [1] http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=62268
> [2] http://se.sun.com/press/feature_stories/2005/051004/sida2.html
>
> In the future, I think we need to push out new dictionaries more
> often, e.g. including new names from politics, news and media. If
> there is going to be a 3 month delay for every update, perhaps the
> spell checker should be redesigned so that it doesn't only rely on
> the dictionary in the distribution, but also checks a live server
> for today's updates.  Such updates could even be built as a
> subscription service.  It might also become important that other
> softwares (e.g. the Firefox browser) use the same spell checker
> and that they use a common spell checking daemon on the local
> computer.
>
> The above should also apply to thesauri and grammar checkers.
>
>
> --
>   Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>   Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to