Laurent Godard wrote: > Just ask here for inclusion in DicOOo repository if ready > if no response of myself, it is because of time, so re-ask > > if your spellchecker is ready (.dic, .aff, readme+licence in a > zip file), tell me i'll do it
The archive at http://hem.bredband.net/dsso1/sv_SE.zip was made available on December 7, 2006 and contains three files: sv_SE.dic, sv_SE.aff and README_sv_SE.txt The latter contains the full LGPL text in English. > Moreover, there are 2 different things > 1 is inclusion in OOo by default, ant thsi is what will happen in 2.3 Yes, and this is what I'm really asking about. In my experience users find DicOOo too complicated. They install the newest standard distribution and find the included Swedish spelling dictionary (ispell from 1997) is a joke. This is a problem. Does the DicOOo mechanism change in 2.1, 2.2 or 2.3 so that it becomes more automated and streamlined? > I'll have a look at wiki link but there may be a problem : > What happens with older versions of OOo than 2.0.2 when we use this > spellchecker ? The new dictionary package uses Hunspell and is specifically for newer versions of OOo. I agree it could be nice to provide an improved dictionary also for older versions, but this is not a priority for me personally. When people attack me because of the bad spell checker, I can get away with telling them to install a newer version of OOo. The sad thing is that a fresh install of OOo 2.1 or 2.2 won't do. Well, what's another year? I can wait. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
