Dana Sub, 24 Jul, 2010 03:41 , Németh László je napisao/la > > Unlike the latin version the Serbian-cyrillic seems to have been > converted, probably because of codepage issues (TeX: 2425, OOo: 2652). >
Both Serbian Cyrillic and Latin were not converted. Cyrillic patterns are based on hyph-sh-cyrl.tex and not on hyph-sr-cyrl.tex so both have the same problem. I would like to thank Martin and you for finding and raising this issue. I have just released new patterns at http://ooo.matf.bg.ac.rs/dict-sr/ and filed a issue for integration into the source tree: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=113478 Kind regards, Goran Rakic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
