Haven't played with Mach II. I would say that those people who have played with it would say that it is not like FB (in fact there is an FB for CFMX) and is actually a different methodology from people who used to do FB. So don't let a dislike of FB put you off.
I'm trying to figure out whether or not it's a good framework for building applications or not. Anyone got any other CFMX methodologies other than Mach II that are standard and that they use? Afaik there is only Mach II and a couple of others that are not as organised as FB/Mach II. Paul > Has anyone done anything with Mach II? Any feedback? > > I really like the idea of using an accepted framework (I try > to modularise, but probably don't do a great job of it) but > had an instinctive dislike of Fusebox. > > However, from just a cursory glance at Mach II, it seems > (from my non-OO > perspective) _very_ nice. > > > -- > Aidan Whitehall <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Macromedia ColdFusion Developer > Fairbanks Environmental Ltd +44 (0)1695 51775 > Queen's Awards Winner 2003 <http://www.fairbanks.co.uk/go/awards> > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star > Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more > information on a proactive anti-virus service working around > the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
