Hello, some more fixes are here: https://review.opencontrail.org/#/q/status:open+owner:Jakub,n,z
Not all components are Openstack version-specific. I think it's only python-neutronclient, contrail-neutron-plugin, nova-vif-driver and contrail-heat. The remaining (eg. contrail-controller) can be run even without Openstack. Filip On 2015/12/23 15:03, Martin Millnert wrote: > Hi Filip, > > On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 12:33 +0100, Filip Pytloun wrote: > > Hello Martin, > > > > we are currently running custom Opencontrail build with patches to > > support both kilo and liberty. > > > > As far as I know these patches are not yet merged upstream. > > Is it these: > https://review.opencontrail.org/#/q/status:open+owner:Filip,n,z > > Are there more, for example from colleagues of yours? > > > You can find our up-to-date opencontrail packages here: > > https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/contrail-2.20 > > > > Some more packages (also not directly connected with opencontrail but > > eg. python-neutronclient with contrail extensions) per openstack release > > are here: > > https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/kilo > > https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/liberty > > > > Patched sources are available in our forked github repositories: > > https://github.com/tcpcloud?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=contrail > > I checked for example contrail-controller: > https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/compare/R2.20...tcpcloud:R2.20 > https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/compare/R2.21.x...tcpcloud:R2.21.x > I couldn't find any more than those two commits (per branch). > > If those commits are all the positive delta there is in your fork, it > looks like you don't support the use of SSL in your distribution. > > Do you keep the remaining patches outside contrail-controller? > > > If you are interested in these builds, you can also check our complete > > Opencontrail + Openstack distribution with automated deployment using > > SaltStack: http://www.opentcpcloud.org/ > > Thanks, but we're building our own packages from source on EL7, so it > doesn't really help. > > My concern is first of all, i.e. the feasibility of a more clear release > plan w.r.t. OpenStack support, so that users can begin submitting fixes > properly, and run against an upstream branch that has a sort of > stable:ish goal. > > I.e., I'd really like to see branches made with a pace that matches > OpenStack releases, without unnecessary delay. There's no foul, IMO, in > having a Mitaka branch open already. > > Regards, > Martin > -- Filip Pytloun Cloud Architect [tcp ◕ cloud] tcp cloud a.s. Thamova 16, 180 00 Prague 8 Mobile: +420 776 004 323 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.opentcpcloud.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
