Hi Martin,
It was approved this week, but I needed to do git rebase. I have just
pushed updated fixes.
https://review.opencontrail.org/#/c/29418/
https://review.opencontrail.org/#/c/14816/
Then they should approved it.
Jakub
On 23.12.2015 17:45, Filip Pytloun wrote:
Hello,
some more fixes are here:
https://review.opencontrail.org/#/q/status:open+owner:Jakub,n,z
Not all components are Openstack version-specific.
I think it's only python-neutronclient, contrail-neutron-plugin,
nova-vif-driver and contrail-heat. The remaining (eg.
contrail-controller) can be run even without Openstack.
Filip
On 2015/12/23 15:03, Martin Millnert wrote:
Hi Filip,
On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 12:33 +0100, Filip Pytloun wrote:
Hello Martin,
we are currently running custom Opencontrail build with patches to
support both kilo and liberty.
As far as I know these patches are not yet merged upstream.
Is it these:
https://review.opencontrail.org/#/q/status:open+owner:Filip,n,z
Are there more, for example from colleagues of yours?
You can find our up-to-date opencontrail packages here:
https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/contrail-2.20
Some more packages (also not directly connected with opencontrail but
eg. python-neutronclient with contrail extensions) per openstack release
are here:
https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/kilo
https://launchpad.net/~tcpcloud/+archive/ubuntu/liberty
Patched sources are available in our forked github repositories:
https://github.com/tcpcloud?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=contrail
I checked for example contrail-controller:
https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/compare/R2.20...tcpcloud:R2.20
https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/compare/R2.21.x...tcpcloud:R2.21.x
I couldn't find any more than those two commits (per branch).
If those commits are all the positive delta there is in your fork, it
looks like you don't support the use of SSL in your distribution.
Do you keep the remaining patches outside contrail-controller?
If you are interested in these builds, you can also check our complete
Opencontrail + Openstack distribution with automated deployment using
SaltStack: http://www.opentcpcloud.org/
Thanks, but we're building our own packages from source on EL7, so it
doesn't really help.
My concern is first of all, i.e. the feasibility of a more clear release
plan w.r.t. OpenStack support, so that users can begin submitting fixes
properly, and run against an upstream branch that has a sort of
stable:ish goal.
I.e., I'd really like to see branches made with a pace that matches
OpenStack releases, without unnecessary delay. There's no foul, IMO, in
having a Mitaka branch open already.
Regards,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
--
Jakub Pavlik
CTO
[tcp ◕ cloud]
+420 602 177 027
[email protected]
tcp cloud a.s.
Thamova 16
186 00 Praha 8 - Karlin
Czech republic
http://tcpcloud.eu
http://opentcpcloud.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
